Author: David Brann; Tatsuya Tsukahara; Caleb Weinreb; Darren W. Logan; Sandeep Robert Datta
Title: Non-neural expression of SARS-CoV-2 entry genes in the olfactory epithelium suggests mechanisms underlying anosmia in COVID-19 patients Document date: 2020_3_27
ID: bb4h255w_44
Snippet: Single-cell RNA-seq data from HBC-derived cells from Fletcher et al. and Gadye et al (27, 42) , labeled via Krt5-CreER driver mice, were downloaded from GEO at accession GSE99251 using the file "GSE95601_oeHBCdiff_Cufflinks_eSet_counts_table.txt.gz". Processing was performed as described above, including total counts normalization and filtering for highly variable genes using the SPRING gene filtering function "filter_genes" with parameters (75, .....
Document: Single-cell RNA-seq data from HBC-derived cells from Fletcher et al. and Gadye et al (27, 42) , labeled via Krt5-CreER driver mice, were downloaded from GEO at accession GSE99251 using the file "GSE95601_oeHBCdiff_Cufflinks_eSet_counts_table.txt.gz". Processing was performed as described above, including total counts normalization and filtering for highly variable genes using the SPRING gene filtering function "filter_genes" with parameters (75, 20, 10) . The resulting data were visualized in SPRING and a subset of cells were removed for quality control, including a cluster of cells with low total counts and another with predominantly reads from ERCC spike-in controls. Putative doublets were also identified using Scrublet and removed (6% of cells) (63) . The resulting data were visualized in SPRING and partitioned using Louvain clustering on the SPRING knearest-neighbor graph using the top 40 principal components. Cell type annotation was performed manually using the same set of markers genes listed above. Three clusters were removed for quality control, including one with low total counts and one with predominantly reads from ERCC spike-in controls (likely background), and one with high mitochondrial counts (likely stressed cells). For visualization, and clustering the remaining cells were projected to 15 dimensions using PCA and visualized with UMAP with parameters (n_neighbors=15, min_dist=0.4, alpha=0.5, maxiter=500). Clustering was performed using the Leiden algorithm (resolution=0.4) and cell types were manually annotated using known marker genes.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- cell subset and RNA seq: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- cell subset and single cell: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
- cell subset and total count: 1
- cell type and count normalization: 1
- cell type and Leiden algorithm: 1
- cell type and likely background: 1
- cell type and likely stress: 1
- cell type and marker gene: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- cell type and principal component: 1, 2, 3, 4
- cell type and quality control: 1, 2, 3, 4
- cell type and remain cell: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- cell type and RNA seq: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66
- cell type and single cell: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75
- cell type and total count: 1, 2, 3
- cell type and UMAP visualize: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date