Author: C Langelier; MS Zinter; K Kalantar; GA Yanik; S Christenson; B Odonovan; C White; M Wilson; A Sapru; CC Dvorak; S Miller; CY Chiu; JL DeRisi
Title: Metagenomic Sequencing Detects Respiratory Pathogens in Hematopoietic Cellular Transplant Patients Document date: 2017_1_24
ID: km0b1z64_53
Snippet: Broadspectrum antibiotic overuse is frequently driven by suspicion for occult pathogens missed by standard diagnostic testing. For instance, patient 1, whose conventional testing While these results are highly encouraging, this proof-of-concept study suggests many routes for further improvement. First, this study was limited by a relatively small sample size, only one case of culture-positive bacterial LRTI, no fungal infections, and no subjects .....
Document: Broadspectrum antibiotic overuse is frequently driven by suspicion for occult pathogens missed by standard diagnostic testing. For instance, patient 1, whose conventional testing While these results are highly encouraging, this proof-of-concept study suggests many routes for further improvement. First, this study was limited by a relatively small sample size, only one case of culture-positive bacterial LRTI, no fungal infections, and no subjects with clinically diagnosed non-infectious airway diseases. Future studies with larger cohorts will be needed to validate the sensitivity and specificity of mNGS for LRTI diagnosis in this population.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- antibiotic overuse and specificity sensitivity: 1
- clinically diagnose and diagnostic testing: 1
- clinically diagnose and fungal infection: 1
- clinically diagnose and specificity sensitivity: 1
- concept proof and conventional testing: 1, 2, 3, 4
- concept proof and diagnostic testing: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- concept proof and future study: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
- concept proof and improvement route: 1
- concept proof and large cohort: 1
- concept proof and sample size: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- concept proof and specificity sensitivity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24
- concept proof study and conventional testing: 1, 2
- concept proof study and diagnostic testing: 1, 2
- concept proof study and future study: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- concept proof study and large cohort: 1
- concept proof study and sample size: 1, 2, 3
- concept proof study and specificity sensitivity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
- conventional testing and diagnostic testing: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- conventional testing and fungal infection: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date