Author: C Langelier; MS Zinter; K Kalantar; GA Yanik; S Christenson; B Odonovan; C White; M Wilson; A Sapru; CC Dvorak; S Miller; CY Chiu; JL DeRisi
Title: Metagenomic Sequencing Detects Respiratory Pathogens in Hematopoietic Cellular Transplant Patients Document date: 2017_1_24
ID: km0b1z64_53
Snippet: Broadspectrum antibiotic overuse is frequently driven by suspicion for occult pathogens missed by standard diagnostic testing. For instance, patient 1, whose conventional testing While these results are highly encouraging, this proof-of-concept study suggests many routes for further improvement. First, this study was limited by a relatively small sample size, only one case of culture-positive bacterial LRTI, no fungal infections, and no subjects .....
Document: Broadspectrum antibiotic overuse is frequently driven by suspicion for occult pathogens missed by standard diagnostic testing. For instance, patient 1, whose conventional testing While these results are highly encouraging, this proof-of-concept study suggests many routes for further improvement. First, this study was limited by a relatively small sample size, only one case of culture-positive bacterial LRTI, no fungal infections, and no subjects with clinically diagnosed non-infectious airway diseases. Future studies with larger cohorts will be needed to validate the sensitivity and specificity of mNGS for LRTI diagnosis in this population.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- clinically diagnose and specificity sensitivity: 1
- concept proof and sample size: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- concept proof and specificity sensitivity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24
- concept proof study and sample size: 1, 2, 3
- concept proof study and specificity sensitivity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
- conventional testing and sample size: 1, 2, 3, 4
- conventional testing and specificity sensitivity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
- diagnostic testing and relatively small sample size: 1, 2
- diagnostic testing and sample size: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- diagnostic testing and specificity sensitivity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- diagnostic testing and standard diagnostic testing: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24
- fungal infection and sample size: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- fungal infection and specificity sensitivity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- future study and relatively small sample size: 1
- future study and sample size: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21
- future study and specificity sensitivity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- large cohort and sample size: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
- large cohort and specificity sensitivity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- large cohort and standard diagnostic testing: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date