Author: Fairchild, Robert M; Horomanski, Audra; Mar, Diane A; Triant, Gabriela R; Lu, Rong; Lu, Di; Guo, Haiwei Henry; Baker, Matthew C
Title: Prevalence and significance of pulmonary disease on lung ultrasonography in outpatients with SARS-CoV-2 infection Cord-id: hn9vid8v Document date: 2021_8_12
ID: hn9vid8v
Snippet: BACKGROUND: The majority of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection are diagnosed and managed as outpatients; however, little is known about the burden of pulmonary disease in this setting. Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a convenient tool for detection of COVID-19 pneumonia. Identifying SARS-CoV-2 infected outpatients with pulmonary disease may be important for early risk stratification. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the prevalence, natural history and clinical significance of pulmonary disease in outpatients
Document: BACKGROUND: The majority of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection are diagnosed and managed as outpatients; however, little is known about the burden of pulmonary disease in this setting. Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a convenient tool for detection of COVID-19 pneumonia. Identifying SARS-CoV-2 infected outpatients with pulmonary disease may be important for early risk stratification. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the prevalence, natural history and clinical significance of pulmonary disease in outpatients with SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive outpatients (CV(+)) were assessed with LUS to identify the presence of interstitial pneumonia. Studies were considered positive based on the presence of B-lines, pleural irregularity and consolidations. A subset of patients underwent longitudinal examinations. Correlations between LUS findings and patient symptoms, demographics, comorbidities and clinical outcomes over 8 weeks were evaluated. RESULTS: 102 CV(+) patients underwent LUS with 42 (41%) demonstrating pulmonary involvement. Baseline LUS severity scores correlated with shortness of breath on multivariate analysis. Of the CV(+) patients followed longitudinally, a majority showed improvement or resolution in LUS findings after 1–2 weeks. Only one patient in the CV(+) cohort was briefly hospitalised, and no patient died or required mechanical ventilation. CONCLUSION: We found a high prevalence of LUS findings in outpatients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Given the pervasiveness of pulmonary disease across a broad spectrum of LUS severity scores and lack of adverse outcomes, our findings suggest that LUS may not be a useful as a risk stratification tool in SARS-CoV-2 in the general outpatient population.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- access prevalence and acute care: 1
- access prevalence and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- acute care and admission likelihood: 1, 2, 3, 4
- acute care and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- acute care and longitudinal analysis: 1, 2
- acute care and longitudinal assessment: 1, 2
- additional baseline and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4
- additional baseline and longitudinal analysis: 1
- admission likelihood and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- logistic regression and longitudinal analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
- logistic regression and longitudinal assessment: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- logistic regression and longitudinal exam: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date