Author: Hayden, Markus C.; Limbach, Matthias; Schuler, Michael; Merkl, Steffen; Schwarzl, Gabriele; Jakab, Katalin; Nowak, Dennis; Schultz, Konrad
Title: Effectiveness of a Three-Week Inpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program for Patients after COVID-19: A Prospective Observational Study Cord-id: k2k8t45h Document date: 2021_8_26
ID: k2k8t45h
Snippet: For COVID-19 patients who remain symptomatic after the acute phase, pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is recommended. However, only a few studies have investigated the effectiveness of PR, especially considering the duration between the acute phase of COVID-19 and the onset of rehabilitation, as well as the initial severity. This prospective observational study evaluated the efficacy of PR in patients after COVID-19. A total of 120 still-symptomatic patients referred for PR after overcoming acute CO
Document: For COVID-19 patients who remain symptomatic after the acute phase, pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is recommended. However, only a few studies have investigated the effectiveness of PR, especially considering the duration between the acute phase of COVID-19 and the onset of rehabilitation, as well as the initial severity. This prospective observational study evaluated the efficacy of PR in patients after COVID-19. A total of 120 still-symptomatic patients referred for PR after overcoming acute COVID-19 were asked to participate, of whom 108 (mean age 55.6 ± 10.1 years, 45.4% female) consented. The patients were assigned to three groups according to the time of referral and initial disease severity (severe acute; severe after interval; mild after interval). The primary outcome was dyspnea. Secondary outcomes included other respiratory disease symptoms, physical capacity, lung function, fatigue, quality of life (QoL), depression, and anxiety. Furthermore, patients rated the overall effectiveness of PR and their subjective change in health status. At the end of PR, we detected improvements with large effect sizes in exertional dyspnea, physical capacity, QoL, fatigue, and depression in the overall group. Other parameters changed with small to medium effect sizes. PR was effective after acute COVID-19 in all three groups analyzed.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- acute care and adequate rehabilitation: 1
- acute care and admission mode: 1
- acute care and admit patient: 1
- acute care and long duration: 1
- acute care and long period: 1, 2, 3
- acute care and low sensitivity: 1, 2
- acute care and lung capacity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- acute care and lung diffusion: 1
- acute care and lung disease: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37
- acute care and lung function: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
- acute care and lung function improvement: 1
- acute care and lung function increase: 1
- acute care and lung injury: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
- acute diagnosis and long duration: 1
- acute diagnosis and long interval: 1
- acute diagnosis and long period: 1
- acute diagnosis and low sensitivity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- acute diagnosis and lung capacity: 1, 2, 3
- acute diagnosis and lung disease: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date