Selected article for: "accuracy increase and machine learning"

Author: Kang, Min Woo; Kim, Jayoun; Kim, Dong Ki; Oh, Kook-Hwan; Joo, Kwon Wook; Kim, Yon Su; Han, Seung Seok
Title: Machine learning algorithm to predict mortality in patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy
  • Cord-id: mih7vm66
  • Document date: 2020_2_6
  • ID: mih7vm66
    Snippet: BACKGROUND: Previous scoring models such as the Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scoring systems do not adequately predict mortality of patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) for severe acute kidney injury. Accordingly, the present study applies machine learning algorithms to improve prediction accuracy for this patient subset. METHODS: We randomly divided a total of 1571 adult pa
    Document: BACKGROUND: Previous scoring models such as the Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scoring systems do not adequately predict mortality of patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) for severe acute kidney injury. Accordingly, the present study applies machine learning algorithms to improve prediction accuracy for this patient subset. METHODS: We randomly divided a total of 1571 adult patients who started CRRT for acute kidney injury into training (70%, n = 1094) and test (30%, n = 477) sets. The primary output consisted of the probability of mortality during admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) or hospital. We compared the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of several machine learning algorithms with that of the APACHE II, SOFA, and the new abbreviated mortality scoring system for acute kidney injury with CRRT (MOSAIC model) results. RESULTS: For the ICU mortality, the random forest model showed the highest AUC (0.784 [0.744–0.825]), and the artificial neural network and extreme gradient boost models demonstrated the next best results (0.776 [0.735–0.818]). The AUC of the random forest model was higher than 0.611 (0.583–0.640), 0.677 (0.651–0.703), and 0.722 (0.677–0.767), as achieved by APACHE II, SOFA, and MOSAIC, respectively. The machine learning models also predicted in-hospital mortality better than APACHE II, SOFA, and MOSAIC. CONCLUSION: Machine learning algorithms increase the accuracy of mortality prediction for patients undergoing CRRT for acute kidney injury compared with previous scoring models.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • acceptable performance and acute kidney injury: 1
    • acceptable performance and logistic regression: 1, 2
    • accuracy high f1 score and logistic regression: 1
    • accurate prediction and acute kidney injury: 1
    • accurate prediction and adaptive regression: 1
    • accurate prediction and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • accurate prediction and low prediction: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • accurate prediction and low prediction accuracy: 1, 2
    • acute aki kidney injury and add benefit: 1
    • acute aki kidney injury and liver failure: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • acute aki kidney injury and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute kidney injury and add benefit: 1
    • acute kidney injury and additional file: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • acute kidney injury and liver failure: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23
    • acute kidney injury and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute physiologic assessment and logistic regression: 1, 2
    • acute physiologic assessment and machine apply: 1
    • adaptive regression and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • add benefit and logistic regression: 1, 2