Selected article for: "different dataset and significant difference"

Author: Maia, Eva; Reis, Bruno; Praça, Isabel; Becue, Adrien; Lancelin, David; Demailly, Samantha Dauguet; Sousa, Orlando
Title: Cyber Threat Monitoring Systems - Comparing Attack Detection Performance of Ensemble Algorithms
  • Cord-id: itnzyy8i
  • Document date: 2021_1_28
  • ID: itnzyy8i
    Snippet: Cyber-attacks are becoming more sophisticated and thereby more difficult to detect. This is a concern to all, but even more to Critical Infrastructures, like health organizations. A Cyber Threat Monitoring System (CTMS), providing a global approach to detect and analyze cyber-threats for health infrastructures is proposed by combining a set of solutions from Airbus CyberSecurity with a machine learning pipeline to improve detection and provide awareness from cyber side to a more global approach
    Document: Cyber-attacks are becoming more sophisticated and thereby more difficult to detect. This is a concern to all, but even more to Critical Infrastructures, like health organizations. A Cyber Threat Monitoring System (CTMS), providing a global approach to detect and analyze cyber-threats for health infrastructures is proposed by combining a set of solutions from Airbus CyberSecurity with a machine learning pipeline to improve detection and provide awareness from cyber side to a more global approach that will combine them with physical incidents. The work is being carried out in the scope of SAFECARE project. In this work, we present the CTMS architecture and present our experimental findings with ensemble learning methods for intrusion detection. Several parameters of six different ensemble methods are optimized, using Grid Search and Bayesian Search approaches, in order to detect intrusions as soon as they occur. Then, after the determination of best set of parameters for each algorithm, the attack detection performance of these six different ensemble algorithms using the CICIDS 2017 dataset are calculated and discussed. The results obtained identified Random Forest, LightGBM and Decision Trees as the best algorithms, with no significant difference in the performance, using a 95% confidence interval.

    Search related documents: