Selected article for: "test specificity and virus testing"
Author: Nicholas Gray; Dominic Calleja; Alex Wimbush; Enrique Miralles-Dolz; Ander Gray; Marco De-Angelis; Elfride Derrer-Merk; Bright Uchenna Oparaji; Vladimir Stepanov; Louis Clearkin; Scott Ferson
Title: No test is better than a bad test"": Impact of diagnostic uncertainty in mass testing on the spread of Covid-19
  • Document date: 2020_4_22
    • ID: 2jwuzfan_51
    Snippet: The copyright holder for this preprint . https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04. 16 Each column corresponds to a different antibody test sensitivity in figure 5 as titled. The specificity for each test in these evaluations was fixed to 90%. In figure 6 each column corresponds to a different antibody test specificity as titled. The sensitivity for each test in these evaluation was fixed to 95%. For all model evaluations in figures 5 and 6 we modelled a c.....
    Document: The copyright holder for this preprint . https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04. 16 Each column corresponds to a different antibody test sensitivity in figure 5 as titled. The specificity for each test in these evaluations was fixed to 90%. In figure 6 each column corresponds to a different antibody test specificity as titled. The sensitivity for each test in these evaluation was fixed to 95%. For all model evaluations in figures 5 and 6 we modelled a continuing and constant ability to conduct targeted active virus testing which continued to remove individuals from the infected population. The infection testing continued throughout each model run with a fixed capacity of 10,000 tests per day, similar to the number of unique individuals that are currently being tested.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • day test and infected population: 1, 2
    • day test and test specificity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • evaluation test and infected population: 1, 2
    • evaluation test and model evaluation: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
    • evaluation test and test specificity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21
    • evaluation test and testing infection: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
    • evaluation test and unique individual: 1, 2
    • evaluation test sensitivity and test specificity: 1
    • evaluation test specificity and test specificity: 1, 2
    • infected population and model evaluation: 1, 2
    • infected population and test specificity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • infected population and testing infection: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27
    • infected population and virus testing: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
    • model continue and test specificity: 1, 2
    • model evaluation and test specificity: 1, 2
    • model evaluation and testing infection: 1, 2, 3
    • model evaluation and virus testing: 1
    • test specificity and virus testing: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
    • testing infection and virus testing: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60