Author: Corey M Peak; Rebecca Kahn; Yonatan H Grad; Lauren M Childs; Ruoran Li; Marc Lipsitch; Caroline O Buckee
Title: Modeling the Comparative Impact of Individual Quarantine vs. Active Monitoring of Contacts for the Mitigation of COVID-19 Document date: 2020_3_8
ID: e2p46wa8_25
Snippet: The fraction of contacts traced is a particularly influential consideration. As the probability of tracing an infected contact decreases, more cases are able to transmit the infection without isolation and therefore, there is a linear increase in the average or across the R IQ R AM population ( Figure 5 ). Even with other operational parameters reflecting a high feasibility setting, at least three-quarters of contacts need to be traced and quaran.....
Document: The fraction of contacts traced is a particularly influential consideration. As the probability of tracing an infected contact decreases, more cases are able to transmit the infection without isolation and therefore, there is a linear increase in the average or across the R IQ R AM population ( Figure 5 ). Even with other operational parameters reflecting a high feasibility setting, at least three-quarters of contacts need to be traced and quarantined to reduce in the R e < 1 population in the absence of other interventions. For those individuals who are traced and placed under active monitoring or individual quarantine, however, the impact of the interventions at reducing onward transmission by that person remains effective. Even if only a small proportion of infected contacts are traced, therefore, the transmission chains those contacts could create can be prevented. The extent to which it is worth investing in imperfect contact tracing will depend on the rate of epidemic growth, which affects feasibility, and the other mix of interventions being considered.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- active monitoring and epidemic growth: 1, 2, 3
- active monitoring and epidemic growth rate: 1
- active monitoring and high feasibility: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- active monitoring and high feasibility setting: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- active monitoring and individual quarantine: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- active monitoring and individual quarantine active monitoring: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24
- contact tracing and effective remain: 1, 2, 3, 4
- contact tracing and epidemic growth: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- contact tracing and epidemic growth rate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
- contact tracing and feasibility affect: 1
- contact tracing and high feasibility: 1, 2
- contact tracing and high feasibility setting: 1
- contact tracing and individual quarantine: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
- contact tracing and individual quarantine active monitoring: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- effective remain and epidemic growth: 1
- effective remain and epidemic growth rate: 1
- epidemic growth and individual quarantine: 1, 2
- epidemic growth and individual quarantine active monitoring: 1, 2
- high feasibility and individual quarantine active monitoring: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date