Selected article for: "CS task group and paraphasia type"
Author: Brielle C Stark; Alexandra Basilakos; Gregory Hickok; Chris Rorden; Leonardo Bonilha; Julius Fridriksson
Title: Neural organization of speech production: A lesion-based study of error patterns in connected speech
  • Document date: 2019_2_8
    • ID: nzv96tjh_57
    Snippet: The CS task group showed significant correlations between paraphasia proportions and apraxia of speech severity (neologistic, r=.71, p<.001; phonemic, r=.57, p<.001; unrelated, r=.32, p=.01). There were no significant correlations between any paraphasia type with age or months post-stroke (all r < .04). Both lesion volume (neologistic, r=.37; phonemic, r=.39; semantically related, r=.29; unrelated, r=.66) and AQ (neologistic, r=-.55; phonemic, r=.....
    Document: The CS task group showed significant correlations between paraphasia proportions and apraxia of speech severity (neologistic, r=.71, p<.001; phonemic, r=.57, p<.001; unrelated, r=.32, p=.01). There were no significant correlations between any paraphasia type with age or months post-stroke (all r < .04). Both lesion volume (neologistic, r=.37; phonemic, r=.39; semantically related, r=.29; unrelated, r=.66) and AQ (neologistic, r=-.55; phonemic, r=-.42; semantically related=-.33; unrelated, r=-.62) were significantly related to paraphasia proportion (all p<0.05 after multiple comparison correction). Lesion volume was significantly related to AQ (r=-.73, p<.001). For subsequent VLSM analyses, lesion volume was used as a covariate, and for phonemic, neologistic and unrelated paraphasias, apraxia of speech severity was also used as a covariate.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • comparison correction and Lesion volume: 1, 2
    • comparison correction and lesion volume covariate: 1
    • comparison correction and multiple comparison correction: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
    • comparison correction and paraphasia type: 1, 2
    • CS task group and Lesion volume: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • CS task group and lesion volume covariate: 1
    • CS task group and multiple comparison correction: 1, 2
    • CS task group and paraphasia type: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • Lesion volume and multiple comparison correction: 1, 2
    • Lesion volume and paraphasia proportion: 1
    • Lesion volume and paraphasia type: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • Lesion volume and significant correlation: 1
    • lesion volume covariate and multiple comparison correction: 1
    • lesion volume covariate and paraphasia type: 1, 2
    • multiple comparison correction and paraphasia type: 1, 2