Author: Horry, Michael J.; Chakraborty, Subrata; Pradhan, Biswajeet; Paul, Manoranjan; Gomes, Douglas P. S.; Ul-Haq, Anwaar
Title: Deep Mining Generation of Lung Cancer Malignancy Models from Chest X-ray Images Cord-id: sfk128eb Document date: 2020_12_10
ID: sfk128eb
Snippet: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death and morbidity worldwide. Many studies have shown machine learning models to be effective at detecting lung nodules from chest X-ray images. However, these techniques have yet to be embraced by the medical community due to several practical, ethical, and regulatory constraints stemming from the black-box nature of deep learning models. Additionally, most lung nodules visible on chest X-ray are benign; therefore, the narrow task of computer vision-b
Document: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death and morbidity worldwide. Many studies have shown machine learning models to be effective at detecting lung nodules from chest X-ray images. However, these techniques have yet to be embraced by the medical community due to several practical, ethical, and regulatory constraints stemming from the black-box nature of deep learning models. Additionally, most lung nodules visible on chest X-ray are benign; therefore, the narrow task of computer vision-based lung nodule detection cannot be equated to automated lung cancer detection. Addressing both concerns, this study introduces a novel hybrid deep learning and decision tree-based computer vision model which presents lung cancer malignancy predictions as interpretable decision trees. The deep learning component of this process is trained using a large publicly available dataset on pathological biomarkers associated with lung cancer. These models are then used to inference biomarker scores for chest X-ray images from two, independent data sets for which malignancy metadata is available. We mine multi-variate predictive models by fitting shallow decision trees to the malignancy stratified datasets and interrogate a range of metrics to determine the best model. Our best decision tree model achieves sensitivity and specificity of 86.7% and 80.0% respectively with a positive predictive value of 92.9%. Decision trees mined using this method may be considered as a starting point for refinement into clinically useful multi-variate lung cancer malignancy models for implementation as a workflow augmentation tool to improve the efficiency of human radiologists.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- accurate diagnosis and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
- accurate diagnosis and long history: 1
- accurate diagnosis and loss function: 1, 2, 3
- accurate diagnosis and low number: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- accurate diagnosis and low quality: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- accurate diagnosis and low sensitivity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23
- accurate diagnosis and lung cancer: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- accurate diagnosis and lung cancer diagnosis: 1, 2
- accurate diagnosis and lung cancer malignancy: 1
- accurate diagnosis and lung disease: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- accurate diagnosis and lung disease classification: 1, 2
- accurate diagnosis and lung field: 1
- accurate diagnosis and lung pathology: 1
- accurate diagnosis and machine deep learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- accurate diagnosis and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43
- accurate model and adam optimizer: 1
- accurate model and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18
- accurate model and loss function: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- accurate model and low sensitivity: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date