Selected article for: "median range and treatment group"

Author: Ong, Sean Wei Xiang; Tan, Wilnard Yeong Tze; Chan, Yi‐Hao; Fong, Siew‐Wai; Renia, Laurent; Ng, Lisa FP; Leo, Yee‐Sin; Lye, David Chien; Young, Barnaby Edward
Title: Safety and potential efficacy of cyclooxygenase‐2 inhibitors in coronavirus disease 2019
  • Cord-id: tfvt6sjq
  • Document date: 2020_7_26
  • ID: tfvt6sjq
    Snippet: OBJECTIVES: While the safety of non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs in COVID‐19 has been questioned, they may be beneficial given the hyper‐inflammatory immune response associated with severe disease. We aimed to assess the safety and potential efficacy of cyclooxygenase‐2 (COX‐2) selective inhibitors in high‐risk patients. METHODS: Retrospective study of patients with COVID‐19 pneumonia and aged ≥ 50 years who were admitted to hospital. Adverse outcomes analysed included sup
    Document: OBJECTIVES: While the safety of non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs in COVID‐19 has been questioned, they may be beneficial given the hyper‐inflammatory immune response associated with severe disease. We aimed to assess the safety and potential efficacy of cyclooxygenase‐2 (COX‐2) selective inhibitors in high‐risk patients. METHODS: Retrospective study of patients with COVID‐19 pneumonia and aged ≥ 50 years who were admitted to hospital. Adverse outcomes analysed included supplemental oxygen use, intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation and mortality, with the primary endpoint a composite of any of these. Plasma levels of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines were measured in a subset. RESULTS: Twenty‐two of 168 (13.1%) in the cohort received COX‐2 inhibitors [median duration 3 days, interquartile range (IQR) 3–4.25]. Median age was 61 (IQR 55–67.75), 44.6% were female, and 72.6% had at least one comorbidity. A lower proportion of patients receiving COX‐2 inhibitors met the primary endpoint: 4 (18.2%) versus 57 (39.0%), P = 0.062. This difference was less pronounced after adjusting for baseline difference in age, gender and comorbidities in a multivariate logistic regression model [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.45, 95% CI 0.14–1.46]. The level of interleukin‐6 declined after treatment in five of six (83.3%) treatment group patients [compared to 15 of 28 (53.6%) in the control group] with a greater reduction in absolute IL‐6 levels (P‐value = 0.025). CONCLUSION: Treatment with COX‐2 inhibitors was not associated with an increase in adverse outcomes. Its potential for therapeutic use as an immune modulator warrants further evaluation in a large randomised controlled trial.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • administered treatment and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • administered treatment and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2
    • administered treatment and logistic regression model: 1, 2
    • administered treatment and luminex assay: 1
    • admission chest radiograph and logistic regression: 1, 2
    • admission supplemental oxygen require and logistic regression: 1