Author: Chen, Musha; Yuan, Yue; Zhou, Yiguo; Deng, Zhaomin; Zhao, Jin; Feng, Fengling; Zou, Huachun; Sun, Caijun
Title: Safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Cord-id: m7pbwvxt Document date: 2021_7_5
ID: m7pbwvxt
Snippet: BACKGROUND: Various modalities of vaccines against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), based on different platforms and immunization procedures, have been successively approved for marketing worldwide. A comprehensive review for clinical trials assessing the safety of COVID-19 vaccines is urgently needed to make an accurate judgment for mass vaccination. MAIN TEXT: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to determine the safety of COVID-19 vaccine candidates in randomized controlled
Document: BACKGROUND: Various modalities of vaccines against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), based on different platforms and immunization procedures, have been successively approved for marketing worldwide. A comprehensive review for clinical trials assessing the safety of COVID-19 vaccines is urgently needed to make an accurate judgment for mass vaccination. MAIN TEXT: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to determine the safety of COVID-19 vaccine candidates in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Data search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, Scopus, Web of Science, and MedRxiv. Included articles were limited to RCTs on COVID-19 vaccines. A total of 73,633 subjects from 14 articles were included to compare the risks of adverse events following immunization (AEFI) after vaccinating different COVID-19 vaccines. Pooled risk ratios (RR) of total AEFI for inactivated vaccine, viral-vectored vaccine, and mRNA vaccine were 1.34 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11–1.61, P < 0.001], 1.65 (95% CI 1.31–2.07, P < 0.001), and 2.01 (95% CI 1.78–2.26, P < 0.001), respectively. No significant differences on local and systemic AEFI were found between the first dose and second dose. In addition, people aged ≤ 55 years were at significantly higher risk of AEFI than people aged ≥ 56 years, with a pooled RR of 1.25 (95% CI 1.15–1.35, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The safety and tolerance of current COVID-19 vaccine candidates are acceptable for mass vaccination, with inactivated COVID-19 vaccines candidates having the lowest reported AEFI. Long-term surveillance of vaccine safety is required, especially among elderly people with underlying medical conditions. GRAPHIC ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40249-021-00878-5.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- additional file and local systemic: 1, 2, 3
- additional file and long term safety: 1, 2
- adjuvant addition and local systemic: 1
- adjuvant type and administration route: 1
- administration route and local reaction: 1
- administration route and local systemic: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
- administration route and long term care facility: 1
- administration route and long term safety: 1
- local adverse reaction and long term safety: 1
- local reaction and long term safety: 1, 2
- local systemic and long term care facility: 1
- local systemic and long term safety: 1, 2, 3, 4
- local systemic and long term surveillance: 1, 2
- long term care facility and ltcf long term care facility: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date