Selected article for: "community influenza infection and control group"

Author: Dugré, Nicolas; Ton, Joey; Perry, Danielle; Garrison, Scott; Falk, Jamie; McCormack, James; Moe, Samantha; Korownyk, Christina S; Lindblad, Adrienne J; Kolber, Michael R; Thomas, Betsy; Train, Anthony; Allan, G Michael
Title: Masks for prevention of viral respiratory infections among health care workers and the public: PEER umbrella systematic review.
  • Cord-id: w3ls1d7w
  • Document date: 2020_7_1
  • ID: w3ls1d7w
    Snippet: OBJECTIVE To determine the effect of mask use on viral respiratory infection risk. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library. STUDY SELECTION Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included in at least 1 published systematic review comparing the use of masks with a control group, either in community or health care settings, on the risk of viral respiratory infections. SYNTHESIS In total, 11 systematic reviews were included and 18 RCTs of 26 444 participants were found, 12 in the community and 6
    Document: OBJECTIVE To determine the effect of mask use on viral respiratory infection risk. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library. STUDY SELECTION Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included in at least 1 published systematic review comparing the use of masks with a control group, either in community or health care settings, on the risk of viral respiratory infections. SYNTHESIS In total, 11 systematic reviews were included and 18 RCTs of 26 444 participants were found, 12 in the community and 6 in health care workers. Included studies had limitations and were deemed at high risk of bias. Overall, the use of masks in the community did not reduce the risk of influenza, confirmed viral respiratory infection, influenzalike illness, or any clinical respiratory infection. However, in the 2 trials that most closely aligned with mask use in real-life community settings, there was a significant risk reduction in influenzalike illness (risk ratio [RR] = 0.83; 95% CI 0.69 to 0.99). The use of masks in households with a sick contact was not associated with a significant infection risk reduction in any analysis, no matter if masks were used by the sick individual, the healthy family members, or both. In health care workers, surgical masks were superior to cloth masks for preventing influenzalike illness (RR = 0.12; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.98), and N95 masks were likely superior to surgical masks for preventing influenzalike illness (RR = 0.78; 95% CI 0.61 to 1.00) and any clinical respiratory infections (RR = 0.95; 95% CI 0.90 to 1.00). CONCLUSION This systematic review found limited evidence that the use of masks might reduce the risk of viral respiratory infections. In the community setting, a possible reduced risk of influenzalike illness was found among mask users. In health care workers, the results show no difference between N95 masks and surgical masks on the risk of confirmed influenza or other confirmed viral respiratory infections, although possible benefits from N95 masks were found for preventing influenzalike illness or other clinical respiratory infections. Surgical masks might be superior to cloth masks but data are limited to 1 trial.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • Try single phrases listed below for: 1
    Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date