Author: Zhao, Xuemei; Markensohn, Julia F.; Wollensak, David A.; Laterza, Omar F.
Title: Testing for SARSâ€CoVâ€2: the day the world turned its attention to the clinical laboratory Cord-id: x7v4y1ru Document date: 2020_5_31
ID: x7v4y1ru
Snippet: In the last few months, an unprecedented number of laboratory tests for COVIDâ€19 have been developed at a remarkable speed. With the rapid adoption of these tests into clinical practice, combined with the widespread publicity they received, questions arose related to the different types of tests, their utility, performance, and regulatory approval status. The aim of this publication is to provide a general landscape of laboratory testing for COVIDâ€19 and offer a historical and regulatory per
Document: In the last few months, an unprecedented number of laboratory tests for COVIDâ€19 have been developed at a remarkable speed. With the rapid adoption of these tests into clinical practice, combined with the widespread publicity they received, questions arose related to the different types of tests, their utility, performance, and regulatory approval status. The aim of this publication is to provide a general landscape of laboratory testing for COVIDâ€19 and offer a historical and regulatory perspective associated with them. Specifically, we aim to elaborate on the regulatory complexities of diagnostic testing in the U.S. and its implications to the present outbreak, as well as provide a synopsis of laboratory tests that have been developed for COVIDâ€19. We will first address the detection of Sarsâ€Covâ€2 directly by either nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) or by the detection of the viral protein for active infections. Subsequently, we will provide an overview of serological tests that can aid not only in diagnosis but additionally help to identify prior infections and potential immunity.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- active infection and long antibody: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date