Author: Osterdahl, Marc F; Lee, Karla A; Ni Lochlainn, Mary; Wilson, Stuart; Douthwaite, Sam; Horsfall, Rachel; Sheedy, Alyce; Goldenberg, Simon D; Stanley, Christoper J; Spector, Tim D; Steves, Claire
Title: Detecting SARS-CoV-2 at point of care: Preliminary data comparing Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) to PCR Cord-id: ymdi0sed Document date: 2020_4_4
ID: ymdi0sed
Snippet: Background: The need for a fast and reliable test for COVID-19 is paramount in managing the current pandemic. A cost effective and efficient diagnostic tool as near to the point of care (PoC) as possible would be a game changer in current testing. We tested reverse transcription loop mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP), a method which can produce results in under 30 minutes, alongside standard methods in a real-life clinical setting. Methods: This service improvement project piloted a re
Document: Background: The need for a fast and reliable test for COVID-19 is paramount in managing the current pandemic. A cost effective and efficient diagnostic tool as near to the point of care (PoC) as possible would be a game changer in current testing. We tested reverse transcription loop mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP), a method which can produce results in under 30 minutes, alongside standard methods in a real-life clinical setting. Methods: This service improvement project piloted a research RT-LAMP method on nasal and pharyngeal swabs on 21 residents in an NHS Category 1 care home, with two index COVID-19 cases, and compared it to multiplex tandem reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of a single RT-LAMP swab compared to RT-PCR, as per STARD guidelines. We also recorded vital signs of patients to correlate clinical and laboratory information. Findings: The novel method accurately detected 8/10 PCR positive cases and identified a further 3 positive cases. Eight further cases were negative using both methods. Using repeated RT-PCR as a 'gold standard', the sensitivity and specificity of the novel test were 80% and 73% respectively. Positive predictive value (PPV) was 73% and negative predictive value (NPV) was 83%. We also observed hypothermia to be a significant early clinical sign in a number of COVID-19 patients in this setting. Interpretation: RT-LAMP testing for SARS-CoV-2 was found to be promising, fast, easy to use and to work equivalently to RT-PCR methods. Definitive studies to evaluate this method in larger cohorts are underway. RT-LAMP has the potential to transform COVID-19 detection, bringing rapid and accurate testing to the point of care. This method could be deployed in mobile testing units in the community, care homes and hospitals to detect disease early and prevent spread.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- access lack and additional work: 1, 2
- access lack and loop mediated: 1
- access lack and loop mediated isothermal amplification: 1
- accurate rapid and loop mediated: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- accurate rapid and loop mediated isothermal amplification: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- accurate rapid and low temperature: 1
- accurate rapid and magnetic bead: 1, 2
- accurate rapid testing and loop mediated: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- accurate rapid testing and loop mediated isothermal amplification: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- added value and loop mediated: 1
- added value and loop mediated isothermal amplification: 1
- added value and low temperature: 1
- loop mediated and low temperature: 1, 2
- loop mediated and magnetic bead: 1, 2, 3
- loop mediated isothermal amplification and low temperature: 1, 2
- loop mediated isothermal amplification and magnetic bead: 1, 2, 3
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date