Author: Oscar Patterson-Lomba
Title: Optimal timing for social distancing during an epidemic Document date: 2020_4_1
ID: cm91jxde_20
Snippet: The effects of r and T are important in terms of the extent to which an optimally timed social distancing can reduce the final epidemic size (see Figure (8) in Appendix 3), with longer T and smaller r yielding greater reductions (up to 35% reductions in final size with the parameter ranges explored). Interestingly, the lower the R 0 the greater the reduction in final size......
Document: The effects of r and T are important in terms of the extent to which an optimally timed social distancing can reduce the final epidemic size (see Figure (8) in Appendix 3), with longer T and smaller r yielding greater reductions (up to 35% reductions in final size with the parameter ranges explored). Interestingly, the lower the R 0 the greater the reduction in final size.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- epidemic size and final epidemic size reduce: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
- epidemic size and final size: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- epidemic size and final size reduction: 1, 2, 3, 4
- epidemic size and parameter range: 1
- epidemic size and social distancing: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- final epidemic size and social distancing: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- final epidemic size reduce and social distancing: 1, 2, 3, 4
- final size and parameter range: 1
- final size and social distancing: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- final size reduction and social distancing: 1, 2, 3, 4
- optimally time and social distancing: 1, 2, 3
- parameter range and social distancing: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date