Author: RodrÃguezâ€Tajes, Sergio; Miralpeix, Anna; Costa, Josep; Lópezâ€Suñé, Ester; Laguno, Montserrat; Pocurull, Anna; Lens, Sabela; Mariño, Zoe; Forns, Xavier
Title: Low risk of hepatitis b reactivation in patients with severe COVIDâ€19 who receive immunosuppressive therapy Cord-id: jqe81gwf Document date: 2020_9_24
ID: jqe81gwf
Snippet: A significant proportion of patients infected with SARSâ€CoVâ€2 develop severe respiratory symptoms due to an excessive immune response. Treatment of this condition may include immunosuppressive therapies, such as ILâ€6 receptor antagonists and corticosteroids, which poses a risk for patients with active or past hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. In this prospective cohort study we analyzed the risk of HBV reactivation in patients with severe COVIDâ€19 and resolved HBV infection undergoing i
Document: A significant proportion of patients infected with SARSâ€CoVâ€2 develop severe respiratory symptoms due to an excessive immune response. Treatment of this condition may include immunosuppressive therapies, such as ILâ€6 receptor antagonists and corticosteroids, which poses a risk for patients with active or past hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. In this prospective cohort study we analyzed the risk of HBV reactivation in patients with severe COVIDâ€19 and resolved HBV infection undergoing immunosuppressive therapy. From March 15(th)to April 30(th)2020, 600 patients with severe COVIDâ€19 were admitted into our Hospital and treated with immuneâ€modulators. Data regarding HBV infection was available in 484, of whom 69 (14%) were HBsAg negative/antiâ€HBc positive. For these patients, HBV reactivation prophylaxis with entecavir was strongly recommended. Complete followâ€up was available in 61 patients: 72% were male, median age was 67 years, and antiâ€HBs was >10 IU/mL in 72%. The immunosuppressive drug most used was tocilizumab (72%). Despite HBV prophylaxis recommendation, 38 (62%) patients received entecavir and 23 (38%) did not. Baseline features of both groups were similar. At followâ€up, we found no cases of HBsAg seroreversion and only 2 (3%) patients (no prophylaxis group) had detectable serum HBVâ€DNA (<15 IU/mL). Both were antiâ€HBs negative and had normal aminotransferase levels. Our data show that the risk of HBV reactivation in patients with severe COVIDâ€19 and resolved HBV infection undergoing immunosuppressive treatment is low. However, if a systematic followâ€up after hospital discharge is unfeasible in patients without antiâ€HBs, a short course of antiviral prophylaxis may be a safe option.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- abnormal aminotransferase and liver damage: 1, 2, 3
- abnormal aminotransferase and liver impairment: 1, 2
- active infection and admission time: 1, 2
- active infection and liver damage: 1, 2
- active infection and liver impairment: 1
- active infection and lung inflammation: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- active infection patient and liver damage: 1
- additional factor and admission time: 1
- additional factor and liver damage: 1, 2
- additional factor and liver damage mechanism: 1
- admission time and liver damage: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- admission time and liver impairment: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- admission time and lung inflammation: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- liver damage and lung inflammation: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date