Author: Mulder, E.E.A.P.; Dwarkasing, J.T.; Tempel, D.; van der Spek, A.; Bosman, L.; Verver, D.; Mooyaart, A.L.; van der Veldt, A.A.M.; Verhoef, C.; Nijsten, T.E.C.; Grunhagen, D.J.; Hollestein, L.M.
Title: Validation of a clinicopathological and gene expression profile model for sentinel lymph node metastasis in primary cutaneous melanoma Cord-id: n3w9inwy Document date: 2020_11_2
ID: n3w9inwy
Snippet: BACKGROUND: The Clinicopathological and Gene Expression Profile (CPâ€GEP) model was developed to accurately identify patients with T1–T3 primary cutaneous melanoma at low risk for nodal metastasis. OBJECTIVES: To validate the CPâ€GEP model in an independent Dutch cohort of patients with melanoma. METHODS: Patients (aged ≥ 18 years) with primary cutaneous melanoma who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) between 2007 and 2017 at the Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute were eligib
Document: BACKGROUND: The Clinicopathological and Gene Expression Profile (CPâ€GEP) model was developed to accurately identify patients with T1–T3 primary cutaneous melanoma at low risk for nodal metastasis. OBJECTIVES: To validate the CPâ€GEP model in an independent Dutch cohort of patients with melanoma. METHODS: Patients (aged ≥ 18 years) with primary cutaneous melanoma who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) between 2007 and 2017 at the Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute were eligible. The CPâ€GEP model combines clinicopathological features (age and Breslow thickness) with the expression of eight target genes involved in melanoma metastasis (ITGB3, PLAT, SERPINE2, GDF15, TGFBR1, LOXL4, CXCL8 and MLANA). Using the pathology result of SLNB as the gold standard, performance measures of the CPâ€GEP model were calculated, resulting in CPâ€GEP high risk or low risk for nodal metastasis. RESULTS: In total, 210 patients were included in the study. Most patients presented with T2 (n = 94, 45%) or T3 (n = 70, 33%) melanoma. Of all patients, 27% (n = 56) had a positive SLNB, with nodal metastasis in 0%, 30%, 54% and 16% of patients with T1, T2, T3 and T4 melanoma, respectively. Overall, the CPâ€GEP model had a negative predictive value (NPV) of 90·5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 77·9–96.2], with an NPV of 100% (95% CI 72·2–100) in T1, 89·3% (95% CI 72·8–96·3) in T2 and 75·0% (95% CI 30·1–95·4) in T3 melanomas. The CPâ€GEP indicated high risk in all T4 melanomas. CONCLUSIONS: The CPâ€GEP model is a noninvasive and validated tool that accurately identified patients with primary cutaneous melanoma at low risk for nodal metastasis. In this validation cohort, the CPâ€GEP model has shown the potential to reduce SLNB procedures in patients with melanoma.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- Try single phrases listed below for: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date