Selected article for: "additional data collection and admission time"

Author: Faisal, M.; Mohammed, M. A.; Richardson, D.; Fiori, M.; Beatson, K.
Title: Accuracy of automated computer aided-risk scoring systems to estimate the risk of COVID-19 and in-hospital mortality: a retrospective cohort study
  • Cord-id: gu70bynb
  • Document date: 2020_12_3
  • ID: gu70bynb
    Snippet: Objectives: Although a set of computer-aided risk scoring systems (CARSS), that use the National Early Warning Score and routine blood tests results, have been validated for predicting in-hospital mortality and sepsis in unplanned admission to hospital, little is known about their performance for COVID-19 patients. We compare the performance of CARSS in unplanned admissions with COVID-19 during the first phase of the pandemic. Design: a retrospective cross-sectional study Setting: Two acute hosp
    Document: Objectives: Although a set of computer-aided risk scoring systems (CARSS), that use the National Early Warning Score and routine blood tests results, have been validated for predicting in-hospital mortality and sepsis in unplanned admission to hospital, little is known about their performance for COVID-19 patients. We compare the performance of CARSS in unplanned admissions with COVID-19 during the first phase of the pandemic. Design: a retrospective cross-sectional study Setting: Two acute hospitals (Scarborough and York) are combined into a single dataset and analysed collectively. Participants: Adult (>=18 years) non-elective admissions discharged between 11-March-2020 to 13-June-2020 with an index NEWS electronically recorded within 24 hours. We assessed the performance of all four risk score (for sepsis: CARS_N, CARS_NB; for mortality: CARM_N, CARM_NB) according to discrimination (c-statistic) and calibration (graphically) in predicting the risk of COVID-19 and in-hospital mortality. Results: The risk of in-hospital mortality following emergency medical admission was 8.4% (500/6444) and 9.6% (620/6444) had a diagnosis of COVID-19. For predicting COVID-19 admissions, the CARS_N model had the highest discrimination 0.73 (0.71 to 0.75) and calibration slope 0.81 (0.72 to 0.89). For predicting in-hospital mortality, the CARM_NB model had the highest discrimination 0.84 (0.82 to 0.75) and calibration slope 0.89 (0.81 to 0.98). Conclusions: Two of the computer-aided risk scores (CARS_N and CARM_NB) are reasonably accurate for predicting the risk of COVID-19 and in-hospital mortality, respectively. They may be clinically useful as an early warning system at the time of admission especially to triage large numbers of unplanned hospital admissions because they are automated and require no additional data collection.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents