Selected article for: "average value and correlation coefficient"
Author: Ai, Jing; Shi, Naiyang; Shi, Yingying; Xu, Ke; Dai, Qigang; Liu, Wendong; Chen, Liling; Wang, Junjun; Gao, Qiang; Ji, Hong; Wu, Ying; Huang, Haodi; Zhao, Ziping; Jin, Hui; Bao, Changjun
Title: Epidemiologic characteristics and influencing factors of cluster infection of COVID-19 in Jiangsu Province
  • Cord-id: jxydz0ra
  • Document date: 2021_2_10
    • ID: jxydz0ra
    Snippet: To understand the characteristics and influencing factors related to cluster infections in Jiangsu Province, China, we investigated case reports to explore transmission dynamics and influencing factors of scales of cluster infection. The effectiveness of interventions was assessed by changes in the time-dependent reproductive number (R(t)). From 25th January to 29th February, Jiangsu Province reported a total of 134 clusters involving 617 cases. Household clusters accounted for 79.85% of the tot
    Document: To understand the characteristics and influencing factors related to cluster infections in Jiangsu Province, China, we investigated case reports to explore transmission dynamics and influencing factors of scales of cluster infection. The effectiveness of interventions was assessed by changes in the time-dependent reproductive number (R(t)). From 25th January to 29th February, Jiangsu Province reported a total of 134 clusters involving 617 cases. Household clusters accounted for 79.85% of the total. The time interval from onset to report of index cases was 8 days, which was longer than that of secondary cases (4 days) (χ(2) = 22.763, P < 0.001) and had a relationship with the number of secondary cases (the correlation coefficient (r) = 0.193, P = 0.040). The average interval from onset to report was different between family cluster cases (4 days) and community cluster cases (7 days) (χ(2) = 28.072, P < 0.001). The average time interval from onset to isolation of patients with secondary infection (5 days) was longer than that of patients without secondary infection (3 days) (F = 9.761, P = 0.002). Asymptomatic patients and non-familial clusters had impacts on the size of the clusters. The average reduction in the R(t) value in family clusters (26.00%, 0.26 ± 0.22) was lower than that in other clusters (37.00%, 0.37 ± 0.26) (F = 4.400, P = 0.039). Early detection of asymptomatic patients and early reports of non-family clusters can effectively weaken cluster infections.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • abdominal pain and acute sars cov respiratory syndrome coronavirus: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • abdominal pain and local site: 1
    • abdominal pain and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • abdominal pain and logistic regression model: 1, 2
    • acid detection and acute sars cov respiratory syndrome coronavirus: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acid detection and local transmission: 1
    • acid detection and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
    • acid detection and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • acute sars cov respiratory syndrome coronavirus and live population: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • acute sars cov respiratory syndrome coronavirus and live population high: 1
    • acute sars cov respiratory syndrome coronavirus and local site: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
    • acute sars cov respiratory syndrome coronavirus and local transmission: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute sars cov respiratory syndrome coronavirus and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute sars cov respiratory syndrome coronavirus and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • live population and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • local site and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • local site and logistic regression model: 1
    • local transmission and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • local transmission and logistic regression model: 1, 2