Author: Liu, Mengyang; Li, Zhiwei; Liu, Mengmeng; Zhu, Yingxuan; Liu, Yue; Kuetche, Mandela William Nzoyoum; Wang, Jianpeng; Wang, Xiaonan; Liu, Xiangtong; Li, Xia; Wang, Wei; Guo, Xiuhua; Tao, Lixin
Title: Association between temperature and COVID-19 transmission in 153 countries Cord-id: ko51h3rs Document date: 2021_10_12
ID: ko51h3rs
Snippet: The WHO characterized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as a global pandemic. The influence of temperature on COVID-19 remains unclear. The objective of this study was to investigate the correlation between temperature and daily newly confirmed COVID-19 cases by different climate regions and temperature levels worldwide. Daily data on average temperature (AT), maximum temperature (MAXT), minimum temperature (MINT), and new COVID-19 cases were collected from 153 countries and 31 provinces of ma
Document: The WHO characterized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as a global pandemic. The influence of temperature on COVID-19 remains unclear. The objective of this study was to investigate the correlation between temperature and daily newly confirmed COVID-19 cases by different climate regions and temperature levels worldwide. Daily data on average temperature (AT), maximum temperature (MAXT), minimum temperature (MINT), and new COVID-19 cases were collected from 153 countries and 31 provinces of mainland China. We used the spline function method to preliminarily explore the relationship between R(0) and temperature. The generalized additive model (GAM) was used to analyze the association between temperature and daily new cases of COVID-19, and a random effects meta-analysis was conducted to calculate the pooled results in different regions in the second stage. Our findings revealed that temperature was positively related to daily new cases at low temperature but negatively related to daily new cases at high temperature. When the temperature was below the smoothing plot peak, in the temperate zone or at a low temperature level (e.g., <25th percentiles), the RRs were 1.09 (95% CI: 1.04, 1.15), 1.10 (95% CI: 1.05, 1.15), and 1.14 (95% CI: 1.06, 1.23) associated with a 1°C increase in AT, respectively. Whereas temperature was above the smoothing plot peak, in a tropical zone or at a high temperature level (e.g., >75th percentiles), the RRs were 0.79 (95% CI: 0.68, 0.93), 0.60 (95% CI: 0.43, 0.83), and 0.48 (95% CI: 0.28, 0.81) associated with a 1°C increase in AT, respectively. The results were confirmed to be similar regarding MINT, MAXT, and sensitivity analysis. These findings provide preliminary evidence for the prevention and control of COVID-19 in different regions and temperature levels. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11356-021-16666-5.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- actual number and additional case: 1
- actual number and additive model: 1, 2
- actual number and lockdown period: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- acute respiratory syndrome and additional case: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18
- acute respiratory syndrome and additive model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- acute respiratory syndrome and local regression: 1
- acute respiratory syndrome and localized subset: 1
- acute respiratory syndrome and lockdown measure: 1, 2, 3
- acute respiratory syndrome and lockdown period: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- acute respiratory syndrome and lockdown policy: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- acute respiratory syndrome and lockdown time: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
- acute respiratory syndrome and loess regression: 1
- additive model and lockdown period: 1, 2
- additive model and lockdown policy: 1
- additive model and lockdown time: 1, 2, 3
- local regression and lockdown period: 1
- local regression and loess regression: 1, 2, 3
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date