Selected article for: "blood oxygen and respiratory infection"

Author: Lampart, Maurin; Rüegg, Marco; Jauslin, Andrea S.; Simon, Noemi R.; Zellweger, Núria; Eken, Ceylan; Tschudin-Sutter, Sarah; Bassetti, Stefano; Rentsch, Katharina M.; Siegemund, Martin; Bingisser, Roland; Nickel, Christian H.; Osswald, Stefan; Kuster, Gabriela M.; Tweenhood, Raphael
Title: Direct Comparison of Clinical Characteristics, Outcomes, and Risk Prediction in Patients with COVID-19 and Controls—A Prospective Cohort Study
  • Cord-id: hjs52bqv
  • Document date: 2021_6_17
  • ID: hjs52bqv
    Snippet: Most studies investigating early risk predictors in coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) lacked comparison with controls. We aimed to assess and directly compare outcomes and risk predictors at time of emergency department (ED) presentation in COVID-19 and controls. Consecutive patients presenting to the ED with suspected COVID-19 were prospectively enrolled. COVID-19-patients were compared with (i) patients tested negative (overall controls) and (ii) patients tested negative, who had a respiratory
    Document: Most studies investigating early risk predictors in coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) lacked comparison with controls. We aimed to assess and directly compare outcomes and risk predictors at time of emergency department (ED) presentation in COVID-19 and controls. Consecutive patients presenting to the ED with suspected COVID-19 were prospectively enrolled. COVID-19-patients were compared with (i) patients tested negative (overall controls) and (ii) patients tested negative, who had a respiratory infection (respiratory controls). Primary outcome was the composite of intensive care unit (ICU) admission and death at 30 days. Among 1081 consecutive cases, 191 (18%) were tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and 890 (82%) were tested negative (overall controls), of which 323 (30%) had a respiratory infection (respiratory controls). Incidence of the composite outcome was significantly higher in COVID-19 (23%) as compared with the overall control group (10%, adjusted-HR 2.45 (95%CI, 1.61–3.74), p < 0.001) or the respiratory control group (10%, adjusted-HR 2.93 (95%CI, 1.66–5.17), p < 0.001). Blood oxygen saturation, age, high-sensitivity troponin, c-reactive protein, and lactate dehydrogenase were identified as the strongest predictors of poor outcome available at time of ED presentation in COVID-19 with highly comparable prognostic utility in overall and respiratory controls. In conclusion, patients presenting to the ED with COVID-19 have a worse outcome than controls, even after adjustment for differences in baseline characteristics. Most predictors of poor outcome in COVID-19 were not restricted to COVID-19, but of comparable prognostic utility in controls and therefore generalizable to unselected patients with suspected COVID-19.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • absence presence and acute ards respiratory distress syndrome: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
    • absence presence and acute phase protein: 1
    • absence presence and acute respiratory infection: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
    • absence presence and additional information: 1, 2, 3
    • absence presence and additional variable: 1, 2
    • absence presence regardless and acute respiratory infection: 1
    • active smoking and acute respiratory infection: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and additional information: 1, 2, 3
    • acute respiratory infection and additional information: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8