Author: Blachere, Francoise M.; Lindsley, William G.; Slaven, James E.; Green, Brett J.; Anderson, Stacey E.; Chen, Bean T.; Beezhold, Don H.
Title: Bioaerosol sampling for the detection of aerosolized influenza virus Cord-id: kxfc4npg Document date: 2007_10_22
ID: kxfc4npg
Snippet: Background Influenza virus was used to characterize the efficacy of a cycloneâ€based, twoâ€stage personal bioaerosol sampler for the collection and size fractionation of aerosolized viral particles. Methods A Collison singleâ€jet nebulizer was used to aerosolize the attenuated FluMist® vaccine into a calmâ€air settling chamber. Viral particles were captured with bioaerosol samplers that utilize 2 microcentrifuge tubes to collect airborne particulates. The first tube (T1) collects particles
Document: Background Influenza virus was used to characterize the efficacy of a cycloneâ€based, twoâ€stage personal bioaerosol sampler for the collection and size fractionation of aerosolized viral particles. Methods A Collison singleâ€jet nebulizer was used to aerosolize the attenuated FluMist® vaccine into a calmâ€air settling chamber. Viral particles were captured with bioaerosol samplers that utilize 2 microcentrifuge tubes to collect airborne particulates. The first tube (T1) collects particles greater than 1.8 μm in diameter, while the second tube (T2) collects particles between 1.0 and 1.8 μm, and the backâ€up filter (F) collects submicron particles. Following aerosolization, quantitative PCR was used to detect and quantify H1N1 and H3N2 influenza strains. Results Based on qPCR results, we demonstrate that aerosolized viral particles were efficiently collected and separated according to aerodynamic size using the twoâ€stage bioaerosol sampler. Most viral particles were collected in T2 (1â€1.8 μm) and on the backâ€up filter (< 1 μm) of the bioaerosol sampler. Furthermore, we found that the detection of viral particles with the twoâ€stage sampler was directly proportional to the collection time. Consequently, viral particle counts were significantly greater at 40 minutes in comparison to 5, 10 and 20 minute aerosol collection points. Conclusions Due to a lack of empirical data, aerosol transmission of influenza is often questioned. Using FluMist®, we demonstrated that a newly developed bioaerosol sampler is able to recover and size fractionate aerosolized viral particles. This sampler should be an important tool for studying viral transmission in clinical settings and may significantly contribute towards understanding the modes of influenza virus transmission.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- accurate rapid method and acute respiratory syndrome: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- actual proportion and acute respiratory syndrome: 1, 2
- acute respiratory syndrome and magnetic capture: 1, 2
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date