Selected article for: "cell culture and RT PCR detection"

Author: Etievant, S.; Bal, A.; Escurret, V.; Brengel-Pesce, K.; Bouscambert, M.; Cheynet, V.; Generenaz, L.; Oriol, G.; Destras, G.; Billaud, G.; Josset, L.; Frobert, E.; Morfin, F.; Gaymard, A.
Title: Sensitivity assessment of SARS-CoV-2 PCR assays developed by WHO referral laboratories
  • Cord-id: nzd5wqqi
  • Document date: 2020_5_4
  • ID: nzd5wqqi
    Snippet: The sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests developed by Charite (Germany), HKU (Hong-Kong), China CDC (China), US CDC (United-States), and Institut Pasteur, Paris (France) was assessed on SARS-CoV-2 cell culture supernatants and clinical samples. Although all RT-PCR assays performed well for SARS-CoV-2 detection, RdRp Institut Pasteur (IP2, IP4), N China CDC, and N1 US CDC were found to be the most sensitive.
    Document: The sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests developed by Charite (Germany), HKU (Hong-Kong), China CDC (China), US CDC (United-States), and Institut Pasteur, Paris (France) was assessed on SARS-CoV-2 cell culture supernatants and clinical samples. Although all RT-PCR assays performed well for SARS-CoV-2 detection, RdRp Institut Pasteur (IP2, IP4), N China CDC, and N1 US CDC were found to be the most sensitive.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • Try single phrases listed below for: 1