Selected article for: "null hypothesis and significant difference"

Author: Brielle C Stark; Alexandra Basilakos; Gregory Hickok; Chris Rorden; Leonardo Bonilha; Julius Fridriksson
Title: Neural organization of speech production: A lesion-based study of error patterns in connected speech
  • Document date: 2019_2_8
  • ID: nzv96tjh_47
    Snippet: 2) The number of participants with lesion damage to a parcel was not significantly different between task groups. We analyzed the number of participants with damage to a parcel, compared across all left hemisphere parcels (gray-and white-matter, JHU atlas) in which at least 10% of subjects had damage. A two-tailed t-test (p<0.05) rejected the null hypothesis, t(137)=0.846 (p=0.399), providing evidence that there was not a significant difference i.....
    Document: 2) The number of participants with lesion damage to a parcel was not significantly different between task groups. We analyzed the number of participants with damage to a parcel, compared across all left hemisphere parcels (gray-and white-matter, JHU atlas) in which at least 10% of subjects had damage. A two-tailed t-test (p<0.05) rejected the null hypothesis, t(137)=0.846 (p=0.399), providing evidence that there was not a significant difference in the number of participants with damage to a left hemisphere parcel between task groups.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • lesion damage and parcel lesion damage: 1, 2
    • lesion damage and significant difference: 1, 2
    • lesion damage and task group: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • null hypothesis and significant difference: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • null hypothesis and task group: 1
    • null hypothesis reject and significant difference: 1
    • parcel damage and significant difference: 1, 2
    • parcel damage and task group: 1, 2
    • parcel lesion damage and significant difference: 1, 2
    • parcel lesion damage and task group: 1, 2
    • participant number and significant difference: 1, 2
    • significant difference and subject 10: 1
    • significant difference and task group: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • subject 10 and task group: 1