Selected article for: "China province and retrospective cohort"

Author: Li, Hui; Xiong, Nian; Li, Changjun; Gong, Yanhong; Liu, Li; Yang, Heping; Tan, Xiangping; Jiang, Nan; Zong, Qiao; Wang, Jing; Lu, Zuxun; Yin, Xiaoxv
Title: Efficacy of ribavirin and interferon-α therapy for hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a multicenter, retrospective cohort study
  • Cord-id: lh0ucm2c
  • Document date: 2021_1_28
  • ID: lh0ucm2c
    Snippet: OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of ribavirin and interferon-α (RBV/IFN-α) therapy in patients with COVID-19. METHODS: This multi-center, retrospective cohort study included patients with COVID-19 admitted to four hospitals in Hubei Province, China, from 31 December, 2019 to 31 March, 2020. Patients were divided into two groups according to their exposure to RBV/IFN-α therapy within 48 hours of admission. Mixed-effect Cox model and Logistic regression were used to explore the asso
    Document: OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of ribavirin and interferon-α (RBV/IFN-α) therapy in patients with COVID-19. METHODS: This multi-center, retrospective cohort study included patients with COVID-19 admitted to four hospitals in Hubei Province, China, from 31 December, 2019 to 31 March, 2020. Patients were divided into two groups according to their exposure to RBV/IFN-α therapy within 48 hours of admission. Mixed-effect Cox model and Logistic regression were used to explore the association between early treatments of RBV/IFN-α with primary outcomes. RESULTS: Of 2037 patients eventually included, 1281 patients received RBV/IFN-α (RBV alone/IFN-α alone/RBV combined with IFN-α) treatments and 756 patients received none of these treatments. In mixed effect model, RBV/IFN-α therapy was not associated with progression from non-severe into severe type (aHR = 1.09, 95%CI: 0.88-1.36) or with reduction in 30-day mortality (aHR = 0.89, 95%CI: 0.61-1.30). However, it was associated with a higher probability of length of hospital stay over 15 days (aOR = 2.11, 95%CI: 1.68-2.64) compared with No RBV/IFN-α therapy. Moreover, the propensity score-matched cohort and subgroup analysis displayed similar results. CONCLUSION: RBV/IFN-α therapy was not observed to any benefit in improving clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19, suggesting that RBV/IFN-α therapy should be avoided in COVID-19 patients.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • acid level and liver function: 1
    • acid level and logistic regression: 1, 2
    • acute myocardial infarction and liver disease: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • acute myocardial infarction and liver function: 1
    • acute myocardial infarction and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute organ failure and liver disease: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • acute organ failure and liver function: 1, 2, 3
    • acute organ failure and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
    • acute organ failure shock and logistic regression: 1
    • acute pulmonary embolism and liver disease: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • acute pulmonary embolism and liver function: 1, 2
    • acute pulmonary embolism and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • acute stroke and liver disease: 1, 2, 3
    • acute stroke and liver function: 1
    • acute stroke and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • adjust age and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    • administration concentration and logistic regression: 1, 2
    • administration delay and liver disease: 1