Author: Li, T.; Garcia-Gutierrez, E.; Scadden, J.; Davies, J.; Hutchins, C.; Aydin, A.; Romano, S.; Sayavedra, L.; O'Grady, J.; Narbad, A.
Title: An optimised protocol for detection of SARS-COV-2 in stool Cord-id: lpnexwho Document date: 2021_1_15
ID: lpnexwho
Snippet: Aim: SARS-CoV-2 has been detected in stool samples of COVID-19 patients, with potential implications for faecal-oral transmission. Compared to swab samples, the complexity of the stool matrix poses a challenge in the detection of the virus that has not yet been solved. The aim of this study was to establish a sensitive and reliable method for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in stool samples. Methods: Stool samples from individuals free of SARS-CoV-2 were homogenised in saline buffer and spiked with a known
Document: Aim: SARS-CoV-2 has been detected in stool samples of COVID-19 patients, with potential implications for faecal-oral transmission. Compared to swab samples, the complexity of the stool matrix poses a challenge in the detection of the virus that has not yet been solved. The aim of this study was to establish a sensitive and reliable method for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in stool samples. Methods: Stool samples from individuals free of SARS-CoV-2 were homogenised in saline buffer and spiked with a known titre of inactivated virus ranging from 50 to 750 viral particles per 100 mg stool. Debris was removed via centrifugation and supernatants were concentrated by ultrafiltration. RNA was then extracted from the concentrated material using a commercial kit and SARS-CoV-2 was detected via real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) using the CDC primers and probes. Results: The RNA extraction procedure we used allowed the detection of SARS-CoV-2 via RT-qPCR in most of the stool samples tested. We could detect as few as 50 viral particles per 100 mg of stool. However, high variability was observed across samples at low viral titres. The primer set targeting the N1 region provided more reliable and precise results and for this primer set our method had a limit of detection of 1 viral particle per mg of stool. Conclusions: Here we describe a sensitive method for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in stool samples. This method can be used to establish the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 in stool and ensure the safety of clinical practices such as faecal microbiota transplant (FMT).
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- accurately quantify and acute respiratory syndrome: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- accurately quantify and additional test: 1
- accurately quantify and lod detection: 1
- accurately quantify and lod detection limit: 1
- acute respiratory syndrome and additional test: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- acute respiratory syndrome and lod detection: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- acute respiratory syndrome and lod detection limit: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- acute respiratory syndrome and low concentration: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- acute respiratory syndrome and low volume: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- acute respiratory syndrome and lysis buffer: 1, 2, 3
- additional test and lod detection: 1, 2
- additional test and lod detection limit: 1, 2
- lod detection and low concentration: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- lod detection and low volume: 1, 2
- lod detection and lysis buffer: 1, 2, 3
- lod detection limit and low concentration: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- lod detection limit and low volume: 1, 2
- lod detection limit and lysis buffer: 1, 2, 3
- low concentration and lysis buffer: 1, 2
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date