Author: Park, So-Youn; Lee, Bomyee; Seon, Jeong Yeon; Oh, In-Hwan
Title: A National Study of Life-Sustaining Treatments in South Korea: What Factors Affect Decision-Making? Cord-id: pcdbpkdg Document date: 2020_11_21
ID: pcdbpkdg
Snippet: PURPOSE: This cross-sectional study investigated the status of life-sustaining treatment (LST) practices and identified characteristics and factors influencing decision-making practices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Agency for Management of Life-sustaining Treatment retains records provided by doctors regarding patients subject to LST implementation. A total of 71,327 patients receiving LST were identified. We analyzed all nationally reported data between February 2018 and October 2019. I
Document: PURPOSE: This cross-sectional study investigated the status of life-sustaining treatment (LST) practices and identified characteristics and factors influencing decision-making practices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Agency for Management of Life-sustaining Treatment retains records provided by doctors regarding patients subject to LST implementation. A total of 71,327 patients receiving LST were identified. We analyzed all nationally reported data between February 2018 and October 2019. Indicators such as the proportion of deaths, records for decision to terminate LST, implementation of LST records, and registration of Advance Statements on LST were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 67,252 (94.3%) end-of life decisions were implemented in South Korea. The proportion of deaths preceded by a LST plan, non-self-determination LST decision, and any advance statements was 33.5% (23,891/71,327), 66.5% (47,436/71,327), and 1.2% (890/71,327), respectively. The logistic regression model revealed that self-determination to terminate LST was more frequent for men than for women and higher for those aged 30–69. Disability (odds ratio [OR], 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56 to 0.61), living in non-metropolitan areas (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.81 to 0.86), and disease comorbidity was independently associated with a low level of self-determination. CONCLUSION: After the implementation of the new LST Act, about a third of patients in end-of-life process made decisions regarding their medical LST. However, family members still play a major role in LST decisions where the patient’s intention cannot be verified. Decisions related to LST are predominantly made when death is imminent. Thus, it is necessary to increase awareness of end-of-life LST decision-making among medical staff and the public.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- logistic regression analysis and low percentage: 1, 2, 3, 4
- logistic regression and long term effect: 1, 2
- logistic regression and long term policy: 1, 2
- logistic regression and long term quality: 1, 2, 3
- logistic regression and low percentage: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date