Selected article for: "direct evidence and Evaluation Development Recommendations Assessment grade approach"

Author: Lynch, John B; Davitkov, Perica; Anderson, Deverick J; Bhimraj, Adarsh; Cheng, Vincent Chi-Chung; Guzman-Cottrill, Judith; Dhindsa, Jasmine; Duggal, Abhijit; Jain, Mamta K; Lee, Grace M; Liang, Stephen Y; McGeer, Allison; Lavergne, Valery; Murad, M Hassan; Mustafa, Reem A; Morgan, Rebecca L; Falck-Ytter, Yngve; Sultan, Shahnaz
Title: Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines on Infection Prevention for Health Care Personnel Caring for Patients with Suspected or Known COVID-19
  • Cord-id: n2q5tppz
  • Document date: 2020_7_27
  • ID: n2q5tppz
    Snippet: BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 is a highly transmissible virus that can infect health care personnel and patients in health care settings. Specific care activities, in particular aerosol-generating procedures, may have a higher risk of transmission. The rapid emergence and global spread of SARS-CoV-2 has created significant challenges in health care facilities, particularly with severe shortages of personal protective equipment (PPE) used to protect health care personnel (HCP). Evidence-based recommenda
    Document: BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 is a highly transmissible virus that can infect health care personnel and patients in health care settings. Specific care activities, in particular aerosol-generating procedures, may have a higher risk of transmission. The rapid emergence and global spread of SARS-CoV-2 has created significant challenges in health care facilities, particularly with severe shortages of personal protective equipment (PPE) used to protect health care personnel (HCP). Evidence-based recommendations for what PPE to use in conventional, contingency, and crisis standards of care are needed. Where evidence is lacking, the development of specific research questions can help direct funders and investigators. OBJECTIVE: Develop evidence-based rapid guidelines intended to support HCP in their decisions about infection prevention when caring for patients with suspected or known COVID-19. METHODS: IDSA formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel including front-line clinicians, infectious disease specialists, experts in infection control and guideline methodologists with representation from the disciplines of preventive care, public health, medical microbiology, pediatrics, critical care medicine and gastroenterology. The process followed a rapid recommendation checklist. The panel prioritized questions and outcomes. Then a systematic review of the peer-reviewed and grey literature was conducted. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess the certainty of evidence and make recommendations. RESULTS: The IDSA guideline panel agreed on eight recommendations and provided narrative summaries of other interventions undergoing evaluations. CONCLUSIONS: Using a combination of direct and indirect evidence, the panel was able to provide recommendations for eight specific questions on the use of PPE for HCP providing care for patients with suspected or known COVID-19. Where evidence was lacking, attempts were made to provide potential avenues for investigation. There remain significant gaps in the understanding of the transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 and PPE recommendations may need to be modified in response to new evidence.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • abstract title and acute respiratory syndrome: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28
    • abstract title and additional grey literature: 1
    • abstract title and additional guideline: 1
    • abstract title and additional literature: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • abstract title and additional study: 1, 2
    • abstract title and live virus: 1
    • abstract title and low evidence certainty: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • abstract title and low quality: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
    • abstract title and low quality evidence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • abstract title screen and acute respiratory syndrome: 1, 2
    • abstract title screen and low quality: 1, 2
    • abstract title screen and low quality evidence: 1
    • academic journal and acute respiratory syndrome: 1
    • academic journal and additional literature: 1
    • acceptable protection and acute respiratory syndrome: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • acceptable protection and additional protection: 1, 2
    • acceptable protection and live virus: 1, 2
    • acceptable protection and low quality: 1