Selected article for: "group testing and recent work"
Author: Junan Zhu; Kristina Rivera; Dror Baron
Title: Noisy Pooled PCR for Virus Testing
  • Document date: 2020_4_8
    • ID: 8kccpd4x_44
    Snippet: Recent work Hanel and Thurner [3] analyzes a two part group testing approach. Their model for PCR uses Pr(Y m = 0|W m > 0) = (1 − p 2 )p 1 , while we use Pr(Y m = 0|W m = w m > 0) = (1 − p 2 )p wm 1 ; we evaluated their approach using ρ = 0.01, p 1 = 0.02, and p 2 = 0.001. Hanel and Thurner's Part 1 pools a block of B = 11 patients at a time. If a pool is negative, all patients in the block are declared healthy; else The copyright holder for.....
    Document: Recent work Hanel and Thurner [3] analyzes a two part group testing approach. Their model for PCR uses Pr(Y m = 0|W m > 0) = (1 − p 2 )p 1 , while we use Pr(Y m = 0|W m = w m > 0) = (1 − p 2 )p wm 1 ; we evaluated their approach using ρ = 0.01, p 1 = 0.02, and p 2 = 0.001. Hanel and Thurner's Part 1 pools a block of B = 11 patients at a time. If a pool is negative, all patients in the block are declared healthy; else The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not peer-reviewed) is the . https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.06.026765 doi: bioRxiv preprint V. DISCUSSION Our current approach relies on various assumptions. Below are issues that can be considered in ongoing and future work.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • approach evaluate and group testing: 1
    • assumption rely and group testing: 1
    • current approach and future ongoing work: 1
    • current approach and PCR model: 1
    • group testing and PCR model: 1, 2, 3
    • group testing approach and PCR model: 1