Selected article for: "PCR outcome and positive PCR outcome"

Author: Goel, V.; Bulir, D.; De Prophetis, E.; Jamil, M.; Rosella, L.; Mertz, D.; Regehr, C.; Smieja, M.
Title: COVID-19 International Border Surveillance Cohort Study at Toronto's Pearson Airport
  • Cord-id: py0tc031
  • Document date: 2021_3_1
  • ID: py0tc031
    Snippet: Objectives: The primary objective was to estimate the positivity rate of air travelers coming to Toronto, Canada in September and October, 2020, at arrival, day 7 and day 14. Secondary objectives were to estimate degree of risk based on country of origin; to assess knowledge and attitudes towards COVID-19 control measures; and subjective well-being during the quarantine period. Design: Prospective cohort of arriving international travelers. Setting: Toronto Pearson Airport Terminal 1, Toronto, C
    Document: Objectives: The primary objective was to estimate the positivity rate of air travelers coming to Toronto, Canada in September and October, 2020, at arrival, day 7 and day 14. Secondary objectives were to estimate degree of risk based on country of origin; to assess knowledge and attitudes towards COVID-19 control measures; and subjective well-being during the quarantine period. Design: Prospective cohort of arriving international travelers. Setting: Toronto Pearson Airport Terminal 1, Toronto, Canada. Participants: Passengers arriving on international flights. Inclusion criteria were those aged 18 or older who had a final destination within 100 km of the airport; spoke English or French; and provided consent. Excluded were those taking a connecting flight; who had no internet access; who exhibited symptoms of COVID-19 on arrival; or who were exempted from quarantine. Main outcome measures: Positive for SARS-CoV-2 virus on RT-PCR with self-administered nasal-oral swab, and general well-being using the WHO-5 index. Results: Of 16,361 passengers enrolled, 248 (1.5%, 95% CI 1.3%,1.5%) tested positive. Of these, 167 (67%) were identified on arrival, 67 (27%) on day 7, and 14 (6%) on day 14. The positivity rate increased from 1% in September to 2% in October. Average well-being score declined from 19.8 (out of a maximum of 25) to 15.5 between arrival and day 7 (p<0.001). Conclusions: A single arrival test will pick up two-thirds of individuals who will become positive, with most of the rest detected on the second test at day 7. These results support strategies identified through mathematical models that a reduced quarantine combined with testing can be as effective as a 14 day quarantine.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • achieve difficult and low prevalence: 1
    • acid extraction and local incidence: 1
    • acid extraction and logistic regression: 1
    • acid extraction and low prevalence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • active feel and logistic regression: 1
    • active infection and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
    • active infection and low incidence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • active infection and low prevalence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
    • local epidemic growth and low incidence: 1
    • local incidence and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3
    • local incidence and low incidence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
    • logistic regression and low incidence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22
    • logistic regression and low prevalence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25