Selected article for: "daily day and intensive care"

Author: Alghamdi, Saleh; Barakat, Bassant; Berrou, Ilhem; Alzahrani, Abdulhakim; Haseeb, Abdul; Hammad, Mohamed Anwar; Anwar, Sirajudheen; Sindi, Abdulmajeed Abdulghani A.; Almasmoum, Hussain A.; Albanghali, Mohammad
Title: Clinical Efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine in Patients with COVID-19: Findings from an Observational Comparative Study in Saudi Arabia
  • Cord-id: mogyxfbu
  • Document date: 2021_3_31
  • ID: mogyxfbu
    Snippet: The aim of this study was to assess the clinical effectiveness of Hydroxychloroquine-based regimens versus standard treatment in patients with the coronavirus disease admitted in 2019 to a hospital in Saudi Arabia. A comparative observational study, using routine hospital data, was carried out in a large tertiary care hospital in Al Baha, Saudi Arabia, providing care to patients with COVID-19 between April 2019 and August 2019. Patients were categorized into two groups: the Hydroxychloroquine (H
    Document: The aim of this study was to assess the clinical effectiveness of Hydroxychloroquine-based regimens versus standard treatment in patients with the coronavirus disease admitted in 2019 to a hospital in Saudi Arabia. A comparative observational study, using routine hospital data, was carried out in a large tertiary care hospital in Al Baha, Saudi Arabia, providing care to patients with COVID-19 between April 2019 and August 2019. Patients were categorized into two groups: the Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) group, treated with HCQ in a dose of 400 mg twice daily on the first day, followed by 200 mg twice daily; the non HCQ group, treated with other antiviral or antibacterial treatments according to protocols recommended by the Ministry of Health (MOH) at the time. The primary outcomes were the length of hospital stay, need for admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), time in ICU, and need for mechanical ventilation. Overall survival was also assessed. 568 patients who received HCQ (treatment group) were compared with 207 patients who did not receive HCQ (control group). HCQ did not improve mortality in the treated group (7.7% vs. 7.2%). There were no significant differences in terms of duration of hospitalization, need for and time in ICU, and need for mechanical ventilation among the groups. Our study provides further evidence that HCQ treatment does not reduce mortality rates, length of hospital stay, admission and time in ICU, and need for mechanical ventilation in patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • action antiviral mechanism and lopinavir ritonavir: 1
    • acute respiratory syndrome and additional information: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute respiratory syndrome and admission time: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute respiratory syndrome and log rank test kaplan meier: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • acute respiratory syndrome and lopinavir ritonavir: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute respiratory syndrome and lopinavir ritonavir ribavirin: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute respiratory syndrome and macrolide azithromycin: 1, 2
    • additional information and admission time: 1, 2, 3
    • adjust cox regression model and log rank test kaplan meier: 1, 2
    • admission time and log rank test kaplan meier: 1, 2, 3
    • admission time and lopinavir ritonavir: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • admission time and lopinavir ritonavir ribavirin: 1, 2
    • admission time and macrolide azithromycin: 1
    • admission time follow and lopinavir ritonavir: 1
    • lopinavir ritonavir and macrolide azithromycin: 1, 2
    • lopinavir ritonavir ribavirin and macrolide azithromycin: 1