Author: Fernándezâ€Penny, Felix E.; Jolkovsky, Eliana L.; Shofer, Frances S.; Hemmert, Keith C.; Valiuddin, Hisham; Uspal, Julie E.; Sands, Nathaniel A.; Abella, Benjamin S.
Title: COVIDâ€19 Vaccine Hesitancy Among Patients in Two Urban Emergency Departments Cord-id: nkfang3k Document date: 2021_8_17
ID: nkfang3k
Snippet: BACKGROUND: Widespread vaccination is an essential component of the public health response to the COVIDâ€19 pandemic, yet vaccine hesitancy remains pervasive. This prospective survey investigation aimed to measure the prevalence of vaccine hesitancy in a patient cohort at two urban Emergency Departments (EDs) and characterize underlying factors contributing to hesitancy. METHODS: Adult ED patients with stable clinical status (Emergency Severity Index 3â€5) and without active COVIDâ€19 disease
Document: BACKGROUND: Widespread vaccination is an essential component of the public health response to the COVIDâ€19 pandemic, yet vaccine hesitancy remains pervasive. This prospective survey investigation aimed to measure the prevalence of vaccine hesitancy in a patient cohort at two urban Emergency Departments (EDs) and characterize underlying factors contributing to hesitancy. METHODS: Adult ED patients with stable clinical status (Emergency Severity Index 3â€5) and without active COVIDâ€19 disease or altered mental status were considered for participation. Demographic elements were collected, as well as reported barriers/concerns related to vaccination and trusted sources of health information. Data were collected inâ€person via a survey instrument proctored by trained research assistants. RESULTS: 1,555 patients were approached, and 1,068 patients completed surveys (completion rate 68.7%). Mean age was 44.1 y (SD 15.5, range 18â€93), 61% were female, and 70% were Black. 31.6% of ED patients reported vaccine hesitancy. Of note, 19.7% of the hesitant cohort were healthcare workers. In multivariable regression analysis, Black race (OR 4.24, 95%CI 2.62â€6.85) and younger age (age 18â€24 y, OR 4.57, 95%CI 2.66â€7.86; age 25â€35 y, OR 5.71, 95% CI 3.71â€8.81) were independently associated with hesitancy, to a greater degree than level of education (high school education or less, OR 2.27, 95%CI 1.23â€4.19). Hesitant patients were significantly less likely to trust governmental sources of vaccine information than nonâ€hesitant patients (39.6% vs 78.9%, p<0.001); less difference was noted in the domain of trust towards friends/family (51.1% vs. 61.0%, p=0.004). Hesitant patients also reported perceived vaccine safety concerns and perceived insufficient research. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccine hesitancy is common among ED patients, and more common among Black and younger patients, independent of education level. Hesitant patients report perceived safety concerns and low trust in government information sources, but less so friends or family. This suggests strategies to combat hesitancy may need tailoring to specific populations.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- absence presence and academic medical center: 1, 2
- absence presence and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- absence presence and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- academic hospital and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- academic hospital and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- academic medical center and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- academic medical center and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- accepted article and logistic regression: 1
- adjunct effect and logistic regression: 1
- logistic regression and long history: 1, 2, 3, 4
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date