Author: Kohmer, Niko; Rühl, Cornelia; Ciesek, Sandra; Rabenau, Holger F.
Title: Utility of Different Surrogate Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays (sELISAs) for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibodies Cord-id: q2wmj6a0 Document date: 2021_5_14
ID: q2wmj6a0
Snippet: The plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) is a preferred method for the detection of functional, SARS-CoV-2 specific neutralizing antibodies from serum samples. Alternatively, surrogate enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) using ACE2 as the target structure for the detection of neutralization-competent antibodies have been developed. They are capable of high throughput, have a short turnaround time, and can be performed under standard laboratory safety conditions. However, there are
Document: The plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) is a preferred method for the detection of functional, SARS-CoV-2 specific neutralizing antibodies from serum samples. Alternatively, surrogate enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) using ACE2 as the target structure for the detection of neutralization-competent antibodies have been developed. They are capable of high throughput, have a short turnaround time, and can be performed under standard laboratory safety conditions. However, there are very limited data on their clinical performance and how they compare to the PRNT. We evaluated three surrogate immunoassays (GenScript SARS-CoV-2 Surrogate Virus Neutralization Test Kit (GenScript Biotech, Piscataway Township, NJ, USA), the TECO(®) SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization Antibody Assay (TECOmedical AG, Sissach, Switzerland), and the Leinco COVID-19 ImmunoRank™ Neutralization MICRO-ELISA (Leinco Technologies, Fenton, MO, USA)) and one automated quantitative SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein-based IgG antibody assay (Abbott GmbH, Wiesbaden, Germany) by testing 78 clinical samples, including several follow-up samples of six BNT162b2 (BioNTech/Pfizer, Mainz, Germany/New York, NY, USA) vaccinated individuals. Using the PRNT as a reference method, the overall sensitivity of the examined assays ranged from 93.8 to 100% and specificity ranged from 73.9 to 91.3%. Weighted kappa demonstrated a substantial to almost perfect agreement. The findings of our study allow these assays to be considered when a PRNT is not available. However, the latter still should be the preferred choice. For optimal clinical performance, the cut-off value of the TECO assay should be individually adapted.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- abbott assay and absence presence: 1
- abbott assay and live virus: 1, 2, 3, 4
- abbott assay and low antibody: 1
- abbott sars and absence presence: 1
- abbott sars and acute phase: 1
- abbott sars and live virus: 1, 2, 3
- abbott sars and low antibody: 1, 2, 3
- abbott test and absence presence: 1, 2, 3
- abbott test and live virus: 1
- abbott test and low antibody: 1, 2, 3
- absence presence and acute phase: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- absence presence and live virus: 1, 2
- absence presence and local reactogenicity: 1
- absence presence and low antibody: 1, 2, 3
- acute phase and live virus: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- acute phase and low antibody: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- live virus and local reactogenicity: 1
- live virus and low antibody: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date