Selected article for: "feasibility applicability and quality improve"

Author: Patricia Rios; Amruta Radhakrishnan; Sonia M. Thomas; Nazia Darvesh; Sharon E. Straus; Andrea C. Tricco
Title: Guidelines for preventing respiratory illness in older adults aged 60 years and above living in long-term care: A rapid review of clinical practice guidelines
  • Document date: 2020_3_26
  • ID: kwncu3ji_287
    Snippet: ☐Purpose and intent of the external review (e.g., to improve quality, gather feedback on draft recommendations, assess applicability and feasibility, disseminate evidence) ☐Methods taken to undertake the external review (e.g., rating scale, open-ended questions) ☐Description of the external reviewers (e.g., number, type of reviewers, affiliations) ☐Outcomes/information gathered from the external review (e.g., summary of key findings) ☐H.....
    Document: ☐Purpose and intent of the external review (e.g., to improve quality, gather feedback on draft recommendations, assess applicability and feasibility, disseminate evidence) ☐Methods taken to undertake the external review (e.g., rating scale, open-ended questions) ☐Description of the external reviewers (e.g., number, type of reviewers, affiliations) ☐Outcomes/information gathered from the external review (e.g., summary of key findings) ☐How the information gathered was used to inform the guideline development process and/or formation of the recommendations (e.g., guideline panel considered results of review in forming final recommendations) NR

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • final recommendation and guideline development: 1
    • final recommendation and guideline development process: 1
    • final recommendation and quality improve: 1, 2
    • final recommendation and rating scale: 1
    • guideline development and Outcomes information: 1, 2, 3
    • guideline development and quality improve: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    • guideline development and rating scale: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • guideline development process and Outcomes information: 1, 2, 3
    • guideline development process and quality improve: 1, 2, 3
    • guideline development process and rating scale: 1, 2
    • guideline panel and Outcomes information: 1, 2, 3
    • guideline panel and quality improve: 1, 2, 3
    • guideline panel and rating scale: 1
    • information gather and Outcomes information: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • information gather and quality improve: 1, 2
    • open end and rating scale: 1
    • Outcomes information and quality improve: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • Outcomes information and rating scale: 1, 2, 3
    • quality improve and rating scale: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31