Author: Christos Nicolaides; Demetris Avraam; Luis Cueto-Felgueroso; Marta C. González; Ruben Juanes
Title: Hand-hygiene mitigation strategies against global disease spreading through the air transportation network Document date: 2019_1_26
ID: l353fvsp_14
Snippet: We assume a flu-type disease, where the recovery rate is µ = 1/4 days -1 (i.e. on average each infected individual recovers after four days) and the reproductive number is R 0 = 3 (i.e. on average each infected individual transmits the disease to three other individuals). The infection rate for the SIR model is β = µR 0 which is equal to the infection rate β 1 for the processes 1 as effective hand washing has been proven to be able to prevent.....
Document: We assume a flu-type disease, where the recovery rate is µ = 1/4 days -1 (i.e. on average each infected individual recovers after four days) and the reproductive number is R 0 = 3 (i.e. on average each infected individual transmits the disease to three other individuals). The infection rate for the SIR model is β = µR 0 which is equal to the infection rate β 1 for the processes 1 as effective hand washing has been proven to be able to prevent around 50-70% of infections 37 . The hand washing effectiveness rate which indicates the average time that washed hands become again contaminated is set to θ = 1/1.5 hours -1 (i.e. is the rate to change from 'washed' to 'dirty' state). We also consider that mostly 1 over 5 people in an airport have cleaned hands at any given moment in time (i.e. 20% of airport population). This is equivalent to hand washing engagement rate among the non-cleaned individuals equal to p = 0.12 per hour (i.e. every hour about 12% of the non-cleaned individuals are washing their hands). We declare this hand washing engagement rate (p = 0.12 hours -1 ) as the status quo (see next section). We vary p to analyze and quantify the effect of hand washing engagement on different scenarios of epidemic spreading.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- engagement rate and infection rate: 1
- engagement rate and non clean: 1
- engagement rate and recovery rate: 1
- engagement rate and SIR model: 1, 2, 3
- engagement rate and SIR model infection rate: 1
- engagement rate and status quo: 1, 2, 3
- engagement rate and washing effectiveness: 1
- engagement rate and washing effectiveness rate: 1
- engagement rate and washing engagement: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- infection rate and non clean: 1
- infection rate and recovery rate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81
- infection rate and reproductive number: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44
- infection rate and SIR model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77
- infection rate and SIR model infection rate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
- infection rate and status quo: 1, 2
- infection rate and washing effectiveness: 1
- infection rate and washing effectiveness rate: 1
- infection rate and washing engagement: 1
- infection rate and washing engagement rate: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date