Selected article for: "chain reaction and viral antigen detection"

Author: Choudhary, Manohar L.; Anand, Siddharth P.; Heydari, Mostafa; Rane, Grishma; Potdar, Varsha A.; Chadha, Mandeep S.; Mishra, Akhilesh C.
Title: Development of a multiplex one step RT-PCR that detects eighteen respiratory viruses in clinical specimens and comparison with real time RT-PCR
  • Cord-id: oihcay6w
  • Document date: 2013_1_8
  • ID: oihcay6w
    Snippet: Rapid and accurate diagnosis of viral respiratory infections is crucial for patient management. Multiplex reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (mRT-PCR) is used increasingly to diagnose respiratory infections and has shown to be more sensitive than viral culture and antigen detection. Objective of the present study was to develop a one-step mRT-PCR that could detect 18 respiratory viruses in three sets. The method was compared with real time RT-PCR (rRT-PCR) for its sensitivity and sp
    Document: Rapid and accurate diagnosis of viral respiratory infections is crucial for patient management. Multiplex reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (mRT-PCR) is used increasingly to diagnose respiratory infections and has shown to be more sensitive than viral culture and antigen detection. Objective of the present study was to develop a one-step mRT-PCR that could detect 18 respiratory viruses in three sets. The method was compared with real time RT-PCR (rRT-PCR) for its sensitivity and specificity. Clinical specimens from 843 pediatric patients with respiratory symptoms were used in the study. 503 (59.7%) samples were detected positive by mRT-PCR. Of these 462 (54.8%) exhibited presence of a single pathogen and 41 (4.9%) had multiple pathogens. rRT-PCR detected 439 (52.1%) positive samples, where 419 (49.7%) exhibited one virus and 20 (2.4%) showed co-infections. Concordance between mRT-PCR and rRT-PCR was 91.9% and kappa correlation 0.837. Sensitivity and specificity of mRT-PCR were 99.5% and 83.7% while that of rRT-PCR was 86.9% and 99.4% respectively. Rhinovirus (17.2%) was the most frequently detected virus followed by respiratory syncytial virus B (15.4%), H1N1pdm09 (8.54%), parainfluenza virus-3 (5.8%) and metapneumovirus (5.2%). In conclusion, mRT-PCR is a rapid, cost effective, specific and highly sensitive method for detection of respiratory viruses.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • acid amplification test and lod detection limit: 1
    • acid amplification test and low concentration: 1
    • acid amplification test and low detection: 1, 2
    • acid amplification test and low sensitivity: 1
    • acute respiratory illness and low detection: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • acute respiratory illness and low sensitivity: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • lod detection limit and low concentration: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • lod detection limit and low detection: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23
    • lod detection limit and low sensitivity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6