Selected article for: "cross sectional study and risk prevalence"

Author: Peter G. van der Velden; Miquelle Marchand; Boukje Cuelenaere; Marcel Das
Title: Pre-outbreak determinants of perceived risks of corona infection and preventive measures taken. A prospective population-based study
  • Document date: 2020_4_6
  • ID: 9309aig5_63
    Snippet: Our findings are somewhat similar to the results of a study reported by the WHO Regional Office for Europe [6] . This serial cross-sectional study conducted in Germany in almost the same period as our study (week 10 and 11 2020) showed that the prevalence of respondents who perceived the risk to be infected by the coronavirus as high, increased from 16.8% to 21.4%. They furthermore reported, like us, that older respondents (60+) felt less likely .....
    Document: Our findings are somewhat similar to the results of a study reported by the WHO Regional Office for Europe [6] . This serial cross-sectional study conducted in Germany in almost the same period as our study (week 10 and 11 2020) showed that the prevalence of respondents who perceived the risk to be infected by the coronavirus as high, increased from 16.8% to 21.4%. They furthermore reported, like us, that older respondents (60+) felt less likely be infected. Importantly, in our study the effects of other factors that are associated with the perceived risk of corona infection were controlled for such as pre-outbreak respiratory and heart problems, and education level. Asmundson and Taylor [18] reported that, according to polls, in the US 56%

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents