Author: Castillo-Olivares, J.; Wells, D.; Ferrari, M.; Chan, A.; Smith, P.; Nadesalingam, A.; Paloniemi, M.; Carnell, G.; Ohlendorf, L.; Cantoni, D.; Mayora-Neto, M.; Palmer, P.; Tonks, P.; Temperton, N.; Neckermann, P.; Peterhoff, D.; Wagner, R. J.; Doffinger, R.; Kempster, S.; Otter, A.; Semper, A.; Brooks, T.; Page, M.; Albecka, A.; Briggs, J.; James, L.; Schwabble, W.; Baxendale, D. H.; Heeney, J.
Title: Towards Internationally standardised humoral Immune Correlates of Protection from SARS CoV 2 infection and COVID-19 disease Cord-id: nu24jowd Document date: 2021_5_23
ID: nu24jowd
Snippet: Precision monitoring of antibody responses during the COVID-19 pandemic is increasingly important during large scale vaccine rollout and rise in prevalence of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome- related Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants of concern (VOC). Equally important is defining Correlates of Protection (CoP) for SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease. Data from epidemiological studies and vaccine trials identified virus neutralising antibodies (VNab) and SARS- CoV-2 antigen-specific (n
Document: Precision monitoring of antibody responses during the COVID-19 pandemic is increasingly important during large scale vaccine rollout and rise in prevalence of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome- related Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants of concern (VOC). Equally important is defining Correlates of Protection (CoP) for SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease. Data from epidemiological studies and vaccine trials identified virus neutralising antibodies (VNab) and SARS- CoV-2 antigen-specific (notably RBD, and S) binding antibodies as candidate CoP. In this study, we used the World Health Organisation (WHO) international standard to benchmark neutralising antibody responses and a large panel of binding antibody assays to compare convalescent sera obtained from: a) COVID-19 patients; b) SARS-CoV-2 seropositive healthcare workers (HCW) and c) seronegative HCW. The ultimate aim of this study, was to identify biomarkers of humoral immunity that could be used as candidate CoP in internationally accepted unitage. Whenever suitable, the antibody levels of the samples studied were expressed in International Units (INU) for virus neutralisation assays or International Binding Antibody Units (BAU) for ELISA tests. In this work we used commercial and non-commercial antibody binding assays; a lateral flow test for detection of SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG / IgM; a high throughput multiplexed particle flow cytometry assay for SARS-CoV-2 Spike (S), Nucleocapsid (N) and Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) proteins); a multiplex antigen semi-automated immuno-blotting assay measuring IgM, IgA and IgG; a pseudotyped microneutralisation test (pMN) and electroporation-dependent neutralisation assay (EDNA). Our results indicate that overall, severe COVID-19 patients showed statistically significantly higher levels of SARS-CoV-2-specific neutralising antibodies (average 1029 IU/ml) than those observed in seropositive HCW with mild or asymptomatic infections (379 IU/ml) and that clinical severity scoring, based on WHO guidelines was tightly correlated with neutralisation and RBD / S binding assays. In addition, there was a positive correlation between severity, N-antibody assays and intracellular virus neutralisation.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- additional test and longitudinal study: 1
- live virus and longitudinal study: 1, 2, 3
- live virus and low present: 1
- log logistic and longitudinal analysis: 1
- log logistic and longitudinal study: 1
- longitudinal study and low present: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date