Selected article for: "acute respiratory distress syndrome and adjusted analysis"

Author: Panwar, Rakshit; Madotto, Fabiana; Laffey, John G.
Title: Compliance Phenotypes in Early Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome before the COVID-19 Pandemic
  • Cord-id: nuorcp7u
  • Document date: 2020_11_1
  • ID: nuorcp7u
    Snippet: Rationale: A novel model of phenotypes based on set thresholds of respiratory system compliance (Crs) was recently postulated in context of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In particular, the dissociation between the degree of hypoxemia and Crs was characterized as a distinct ARDS phenotype. Objectives: To determine whether such Crs-based phenotypes existed among patients with ARDS before the COVID-19 pandemic and to closely examine the Crs–mortality r
    Document: Rationale: A novel model of phenotypes based on set thresholds of respiratory system compliance (Crs) was recently postulated in context of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In particular, the dissociation between the degree of hypoxemia and Crs was characterized as a distinct ARDS phenotype. Objectives: To determine whether such Crs-based phenotypes existed among patients with ARDS before the COVID-19 pandemic and to closely examine the Crs–mortality relationship. Methods: We undertook a secondary analysis of patients with ARDS, who were invasively ventilated on controlled modes and enrolled in a large, multinational, epidemiological study. We assessed Crs, degree of hypoxemia, and associated Crs-based phenotypic patterns with their characteristics and outcomes. Measurements and Main Results: Among 1,117 patients with ARDS who met inclusion criteria, the median Crs was 30 (interquartile range, 23–40) ml/cm H(2)O. One hundred thirty-six (12%) patients had preserved Crs (≥50 ml/cm H(2)O; phenotype with low elastance [“phenotype L”]), and 827 (74%) patients had poor Crs (<40 ml/cm H(2)O; phenotype with high elastance [“phenotype H”]). Compared with those with phenotype L, patients with phenotype H were sicker and had more comorbidities and higher hospital mortality (32% vs. 45%; P < 0.05). A near complete dissociation between Pa(O(2))/Fi(O(2)) and Crs was observed. Of 136 patients with phenotype L, 58 (43%) had a Pa(O(2))/Fi(O(2)) < 150. In a multivariable-adjusted analysis, the Crs was independently associated with hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio per ml/cm H(2)O increase, 0.988; 95% confidence interval, 0.979–0.996; P = 0.005). Conclusions: A wide range of Crs was observed in non–COVID-19 ARDS. Approximately one in eight patients had preserved Crs. Pa(O(2))/Fi(O(2)) and Crs were dissociated. Lower Crs was independently associated with higher mortality. The Crs–mortality relationship lacked a clear transition threshold.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and adjunctive therapy: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and liver disease: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and low elastance: 1, 2, 3
    • acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and adjunctive therapy: 1
    • acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and liver disease: 1
    • acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and logistic regression model: 1, 2
    • acute icu hypoxemic respiratory failure and logistic regression: 1, 2
    • acute respiratory failure and adjunctive measure: 1
    • acute respiratory failure and adjunctive therapy: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • acute respiratory failure and liver disease: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • acute respiratory failure and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute respiratory failure and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • acute respiratory failure and low elastance: 1
    • additive model and liver disease: 1
    • additive model and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18
    • additive model and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9