Author: Jin, Xinyao; Chua, Hui Zi; Wang, Keyi; Li, Nan; Zheng, Wenke; Pang, Wentai; Yang, Fengwen; Pang, Bo; Zhang, Mingyan; Zhang, Junhua
Title: Evidence for the medicinal value of Squama Manitis (pangolin scale): a systematic review Cord-id: s4geovzo Document date: 2020_7_28
ID: s4geovzo
Snippet: BACKGROUND: Squama Manitis (pangolin scale) has been used in traditional Chinese medicine for thousands of years. However, its efficacy has not been systematically reviewed. This review aims to fill the gat. METHODS: We searched six electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database (CNKI), WanFang Database and SinoMed from inception to May 1, 2020. Search terms included “pangolinâ€, “Squama Manitisâ€, “Manis crassicaudataâ€
Document: BACKGROUND: Squama Manitis (pangolin scale) has been used in traditional Chinese medicine for thousands of years. However, its efficacy has not been systematically reviewed. This review aims to fill the gat. METHODS: We searched six electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database (CNKI), WanFang Database and SinoMed from inception to May 1, 2020. Search terms included “pangolinâ€, “Squama Manitisâ€, “Manis crassicaudataâ€, “Manis javanicaâ€, “Malayan pangolinsâ€, “Manis pentadactylaâ€, “Ling Liâ€, “Chuan Shan Jiaâ€, “Shan Jiaâ€, “Pao Jia Zhuâ€, “Jia Pian†and “Pao Shan Jiaâ€. The Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB) assessment tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) were used to evaluate the risk of bias of the included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and case control studies (CCSs). RESULTS: After screening, 15 articles that met the inclusion criteria were finally included. There were 4 randomized controlled trials, 1 case control study, 3 case series and 7 case reports. A total of 15 different diseases were reported in these studies, thus the data could not be merged and descriptive analysis was carried out. Included RCTs of this review have shown that Squama Manitis combined with herbal decoction was superior to herbal decoction alone in the treatment of postpartum hypogalactia (RR 1.21, 95% CI1.11 to 1.32, P < 0.00001) and breast hyperplasia (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.19, P = 0.24), and the clinical efficacy of Squama Manitis combined with antibiotics was better than antibiotics alone for acute mastitis (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.35, P = 0.16) and mesenteric lymphadenitis (RR 1.51, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.09, P = 0.01). The methodological quality was generally low in all included reports. CONCLUSION: There is no reliable evidence that Squama Manitis has special medicinal value. The removal of Squama Manitis from Pharmacopoeia is rational.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- abstract title screen and acute respiratory: 1, 2
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date