Selected article for: "cross immunity and incidence proxy"

Author: Stephen M Kissler; Christine Tedijanto; Edward Goldstein; Yonatan H. Grad; Marc Lipsitch
Title: Projecting the transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 through the post-pandemic period
  • Document date: 2020_3_6
  • ID: f4hj35dr_5
    Snippet: Per incidence proxy unit, the effect of the cross-immunizing strain was always less than the effect of the strain itself (Table S1), but the overall impact of cross-immunity could still be substantial if the cross-immunizing strain had a large outbreak (e.g. HCoV-OC43 in 2014-15 and 2016-17) . Seasonal forcing appears to drive the rise in transmissibility at the start of the season (late October through early December), while depletion of suscept.....
    Document: Per incidence proxy unit, the effect of the cross-immunizing strain was always less than the effect of the strain itself (Table S1), but the overall impact of cross-immunity could still be substantial if the cross-immunizing strain had a large outbreak (e.g. HCoV-OC43 in 2014-15 and 2016-17) . Seasonal forcing appears to drive the rise in transmissibility at the start of the season (late October through early December), while depletion of susceptibles plays a comparatively larger role in the decline in transmissibility towards the end of the season. The strain-season coefficients were fairly consistent across seasons for each strain and lacked a clear correlation with incidence in prior seasons, consistent with experimental results showing substantial waning of immunity within a year (14) .

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • cross immunity and season start: 1
    • cross immunity and seasonal forcing: 1, 2, 3
    • large outbreak and season end: 1
    • prior season and season end: 1, 2, 3
    • prior season and season start: 1, 2, 3