Selected article for: "clinical information and deep learning model"

Author: Castiglioni, Isabella; Ippolito, Davide; Interlenghi, Matteo; Monti, Caterina Beatrice; Salvatore, Christian; Schiaffino, Simone; Polidori, Annalisa; Gandola, Davide; Messa, Cristina; Sardanelli, Francesco
Title: Machine learning applied on chest x-ray can aid in the diagnosis of COVID-19: a first experience from Lombardy, Italy
  • Cord-id: lb8qfei2
  • Document date: 2021_2_2
  • ID: lb8qfei2
    Snippet: BACKGROUND: We aimed to train and test a deep learning classifier to support the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) using chest x-ray (CXR) on a cohort of subjects from two hospitals in Lombardy, Italy. METHODS: We used for training and validation an ensemble of ten convolutional neural networks (CNNs) with mainly bedside CXRs of 250 COVID-19 and 250 non-COVID-19 subjects from two hospitals (Centres 1 and 2). We then tested such system on bedside CXRs of an independent group of 110
    Document: BACKGROUND: We aimed to train and test a deep learning classifier to support the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) using chest x-ray (CXR) on a cohort of subjects from two hospitals in Lombardy, Italy. METHODS: We used for training and validation an ensemble of ten convolutional neural networks (CNNs) with mainly bedside CXRs of 250 COVID-19 and 250 non-COVID-19 subjects from two hospitals (Centres 1 and 2). We then tested such system on bedside CXRs of an independent group of 110 patients (74 COVID-19, 36 non-COVID-19) from one of the two hospitals. A retrospective reading was performed by two radiologists in the absence of any clinical information, with the aim to differentiate COVID-19 from non-COVID-19 patients. Real-time polymerase chain reaction served as the reference standard. RESULTS: At 10-fold cross-validation, our deep learning model classified COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients with 0.78 sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74–0.81), 0.82 specificity (95% CI 0.78–0.85), and 0.89 area under the curve (AUC) (95% CI 0.86–0.91). For the independent dataset, deep learning showed 0.80 sensitivity (95% CI 0.72–0.86) (59/74), 0.81 specificity (29/36) (95% CI 0.73–0.87), and 0.81 AUC (95% CI 0.73–0.87). Radiologists’ reading obtained 0.63 sensitivity (95% CI 0.52–0.74) and 0.78 specificity (95% CI 0.61–0.90) in Centre 1 and 0.64 sensitivity (95% CI 0.52–0.74) and 0.86 specificity (95% CI 0.71–0.95) in Centre 2. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary experience based on ten CNNs trained on a limited training dataset shows an interesting potential of deep learning for COVID-19 diagnosis. Such tool is in training with new CXRs to further increase its performance.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • absence presence and accurately quickly: 1
    • absence presence and actual prevalence: 1
    • absence presence and acute respiratory syndrome: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • absence presence and local ethics committee: 1
    • absence presence and local scale: 1
    • absence presence and low prevalence: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • accurately quickly and acute respiratory syndrome: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • acquisition protocol and acute respiratory syndrome: 1
    • actual prevalence and acute respiratory syndrome: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • actual prevalence and low prevalence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • acute respiratory syndrome and local ethics committee: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • acute respiratory syndrome and local scale: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
    • acute respiratory syndrome and low prevalence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute respiratory syndrome and lung abnormality: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
    • acutely ill and local ethics committee: 1
    • acutely ill and low prevalence: 1
    • local scale and low prevalence: 1, 2