Author: Baciarello, Marco; Bonetti, Andrea; Vetrugno, Luigi; Saturno, Francesco; Nouvenne, Antonio; Bellini, Valentina; Meschi, Tiziana; Bignami, Elena
Title: Is lung ultrasound score a useful tool to monitoring and handling moderate and severe COVID-19 patients in the general ward? An observational pilot study Cord-id: ruwc1s13 Document date: 2021_5_4
ID: ruwc1s13
Snippet: Lung ultrasound is a well-established diagnostic tool in acute respiratory failure, and it has been shown to be particularly suited for the management of COVID-19-associated respiratory failure. We present exploratory analyses on the diagnostic and prognostic performance of lung ultrasound score (LUS) in general ward patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 pneumonia receiving O(2) supplementation and/or noninvasive ventilation. From March 10 through May 1, 2020, 103 lung ultrasound exams were
Document: Lung ultrasound is a well-established diagnostic tool in acute respiratory failure, and it has been shown to be particularly suited for the management of COVID-19-associated respiratory failure. We present exploratory analyses on the diagnostic and prognostic performance of lung ultrasound score (LUS) in general ward patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 pneumonia receiving O(2) supplementation and/or noninvasive ventilation. From March 10 through May 1, 2020, 103 lung ultrasound exams were performed by our Forward Intensive Care Team (FICT) on 26 patients (18 males and 8 females), aged 62 (54 – 76) and with a Body Mass Index (BMI) of 30.9 (28.7 – 31.5), a median 6 (5 – 9) days after admission to the COVID-19 medical unit of the University Hospital of Parma, Italy. All patients underwent chest computed tomography (CT) the day of admission. The initial LUS was 16 (11 – 21), which did not significantly correlate with initial CT scans, probably due to rapid progression of the disease and time between CT scan on admission and first FICT evaluation; conversely, LUS was significantly correlated with PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio throughout patient follow-up [R = − 4.82 (− 6.84 to − 2.80; p < 0.001)]. The area under the receiving operating characteristics curve of LUS for the diagnosis of moderate-severe disease (PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio ≤ 200 mmHg) was 0.73, with an optimal cutoff value of 11 (positive predictive value: 0.98; negative predictive value: 0.29). Patients who eventually needed invasive ventilation and/or died during admission had significantly higher LUS throughout their stay.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- absolute value and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- absolute value and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3
- access funding and logistic regression: 1, 2
- admission ct scan and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- admission ct scan and logistic regression model: 1
- admission day and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- admission day and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
- admission die and logistic regression: 1
- admission week and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- admission week and logistic regression model: 1, 2
- logistic regression and lu scoring: 1
- logistic regression model and lu scoring: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date