Selected article for: "individual target testing and target testing"

Author: Bay, Wei Heng; Price, Eric; Scarlett, Jonathan
Title: Optimal Non-Adaptive Probabilistic Group Testing in General Sparsity Regimes
  • Cord-id: q3ukwjt3
  • Document date: 2020_6_2
  • ID: q3ukwjt3
    Snippet: In this paper, we consider the problem of noiseless non-adaptive probabilistic group testing, in which the goal is high-probability recovery of the defective set. We show that in the case of $n$ items among which $k$ are defective, the smallest possible number of tests equals $\min\{ C_{k,n} k \log n, n\}$ up to lower-order asymptotic terms, where $C_{k,n}$ is a uniformly bounded constant (varying depending on the scaling of $k$ with respect to $n$) with a simple explicit expression. The algorit
    Document: In this paper, we consider the problem of noiseless non-adaptive probabilistic group testing, in which the goal is high-probability recovery of the defective set. We show that in the case of $n$ items among which $k$ are defective, the smallest possible number of tests equals $\min\{ C_{k,n} k \log n, n\}$ up to lower-order asymptotic terms, where $C_{k,n}$ is a uniformly bounded constant (varying depending on the scaling of $k$ with respect to $n$) with a simple explicit expression. The algorithmic upper bound follows from a minor adaptation of an existing analysis of the Definite Defectives (DD) algorithm, and the algorithm-independent lower bound builds on existing works for the regimes $k \le n^{1-\Omega(1)}$ and $k = \Theta(n)$. In sufficiently sparse regimes (including $k = o\big( \frac{n}{\log n} \big)$), our main result generalizes that of Coja-Oghlan {\em et al.} (2020) by avoiding the assumption $k \le n^{1-\Omega(1)}$, whereas in sufficiently dense regimes (including $k = \omega\big( \frac{n}{\log n} \big)$), our main result shows that individual testing is asymptotically optimal for any non-zero target success probability, thus strengthening an existing result of Aldridge (2019) in terms of both the error probability and the assumed scaling of $k$.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • adaptive setting and lower bound: 1
    • low upper bound and lower bound: 1