Selected article for: "abdominal pain and child group"
Author: Khayat, Ammar; Algethami, Ghady; Baik, Sama; Alhajori, Mai; Banjar, Dhayy
Title: The Effect of Using Rome IV Criteria on the Prevalence of Functional Abdominal Pain Disorders and Functional Constipation among Children of the Western Region of Saudi Arabia
  • Cord-id: t44lqs39
  • Document date: 2021_5_31
    • ID: t44lqs39
    Snippet: Functional gastrointestinal disorders are characterized by absence of anatomical and biochemical alterations, and are diagnosed and classified based on symptomatology. We aim to explore the prevalence of functional abdominal pain disorders and Functional constipation using Rome IV criteria. An online questionnaire was distributed randomly via social media targeting the general population of the western region of Saudi Arabia. Parents who have at least 1 child in the age group 3 to 18 years were
    Document: Functional gastrointestinal disorders are characterized by absence of anatomical and biochemical alterations, and are diagnosed and classified based on symptomatology. We aim to explore the prevalence of functional abdominal pain disorders and Functional constipation using Rome IV criteria. An online questionnaire was distributed randomly via social media targeting the general population of the western region of Saudi Arabia. Parents who have at least 1 child in the age group 3 to 18 years were included. Children with mental disabilities, or any organic gastrointestinal disorder were excluded. Five hundred thirty-two responded and 215 were excluded. The overall prevalence of functional abdominal pain disorders was 3.1%. The prevalence of functional constipation was 4.7%. Conclusions: Rome IV criteria seems to give a lower functional abdominal pain prevalence than Rome III, online learning did not seem to affect the prevalence of both disorders, but a family stressor seems to increase functional constipation prevalence.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • abdominal pain and logistic regression model: 1, 2
    • abdominal pain and long term outcome: 1, 2, 3
    • abdominal pain and low prevalence: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • abdominal pain and low sensitivity: 1, 2
    • abdominal pain and lower report: 1
    • living status and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • living status and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • living status and low prevalence: 1, 2
    • living status and low sensitivity: 1
    • living status and lower report: 1
    • logistic regression and long term outcome: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    • logistic regression and long term sequalae: 1
    • logistic regression and low prevalence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • logistic regression and low sensitivity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
    • logistic regression and lower report: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    • logistic regression model and long term outcome: 1, 2, 3
    • logistic regression model and low prevalence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • logistic regression model and low sensitivity: 1, 2, 3
    • logistic regression model and lower report: 1