Selected article for: "negative positive and testing 10"

Author: Woolford, S. J.; D’Angelo, S.; Curtis, E. M.; Parsons, C. M.; Ward, K. A.; Dennison, E. M.; Patel, H. P.; Cooper, C.; Harvey, N. C.
Title: COVID-19 and associations with frailty and multimorbidity: a prospective analysis of UK Biobank participants
  • Cord-id: svxiyfue
  • Document date: 2020_7_23
  • ID: svxiyfue
    Snippet: BACKGROUND: Frailty and multimorbidity have been suggested as risk factors for severe COVID-19 disease. AIMS: We investigated, in the UK Biobank, whether frailty and multimorbidity were associated with risk of hospitalisation with COVID-19. METHODS: 502,640 participants aged 40–69 years at baseline (54–79 years at COVID-19 testing) were recruited across UK during 2006–10. A modified assessment of frailty using Fried’s classification was generated from baseline data. COVID-19 test results
    Document: BACKGROUND: Frailty and multimorbidity have been suggested as risk factors for severe COVID-19 disease. AIMS: We investigated, in the UK Biobank, whether frailty and multimorbidity were associated with risk of hospitalisation with COVID-19. METHODS: 502,640 participants aged 40–69 years at baseline (54–79 years at COVID-19 testing) were recruited across UK during 2006–10. A modified assessment of frailty using Fried’s classification was generated from baseline data. COVID-19 test results (England) were available for 16/03/2020–01/06/2020, mostly taken in hospital settings. Logistic regression was used to discern associations between frailty, multimorbidity and COVID-19 diagnoses, after adjusting for sex, age, BMI, ethnicity, education, smoking and number of comorbidity groupings, comparing COVID-19 positive, COVID-19 negative and non-tested groups. RESULTS: 4510 participants were tested for COVID-19 (positive = 1326, negative = 3184). 497,996 participants were not tested. Compared to the non-tested group, after adjustment, COVID-19 positive participants were more likely to be frail (OR = 1.4 [95%CI = 1.1, 1.8]), report slow walking speed (OR = 1.3 [1.1, 1.6]), report two or more falls in the past year (OR = 1.3 [1.0, 1.5]) and be multimorbid (≥ 4 comorbidity groupings vs 0–1: OR = 1.9 [1.5, 2.3]). However, similar strength of associations were apparent when comparing COVID-19 negative and non-tested groups. However, frailty and multimorbidity were not associated with COVID-19 diagnoses, when comparing COVID-19 positive and COVID-19 negative participants. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Frailty and multimorbidity do not appear to aid risk stratification, in terms of positive versus negative results of COVID-19 testing. Investigation of the prognostic value of these markers for adverse clinical sequelae following COVID-19 disease is urgently needed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40520-020-01653-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • access application and logistic regression model: 1, 2
    • acute illness and adapted uk: 1
    • acute illness and additional association: 1, 2
    • acute illness and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51
    • acute illness and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • adapted uk and logistic regression: 1
    • additional association and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3
    • logistic regression and lose weight: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • logistic regression and low asymptomatic: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5