Selected article for: "annual number and average number"

Author: Stephen M Kissler; Christine Tedijanto; Edward Goldstein; Yonatan H. Grad; Marc Lipsitch
Title: Projecting the transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 through the post-pandemic period
  • Document date: 2020_3_6
  • ID: f4hj35dr_2
    Snippet: We used data from the United States to model betacoronavirus transmission in temperate regions and to project the possible dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 infection through the year 2025. We first assessed the role of seasonal variation, duration of immunity, and cross immunity on the transmissibility of HCoV-OC43 and HCoV-HKU1 in the US. We used the weekly percentage of positive laboratory tests for HCoV-OC43 and HCoV-HKU1 (17) multiplied by the weekly p.....
    Document: We used data from the United States to model betacoronavirus transmission in temperate regions and to project the possible dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 infection through the year 2025. We first assessed the role of seasonal variation, duration of immunity, and cross immunity on the transmissibility of HCoV-OC43 and HCoV-HKU1 in the US. We used the weekly percentage of positive laboratory tests for HCoV-OC43 and HCoV-HKU1 (17) multiplied by the weekly population-weighted proportion of physician visits due to influenza-like illness (ILI) (18, 19) to approximate historical betacoronavirus incidence in the US to within a scaling constant. This proxy is proportional to incidence under a set of assumptions described in the Materials and Methods. To quantify variation in transmission strength over time, we estimated the weekly effective reproduction number, defined as the average number of secondary infections caused by a single infected individual (20, 21) . The effective reproduction numbers for each of the betacoronaviruses displayed a seasonal pattern, with annual peaks in the effective reproduction number slightly preceding those of the incidence curves (Fig S1) . For both HCoV-OC43 and HCoV-HKU1, the effective reproduction number typically reached its peak between October and November and its trough between February and April. Over the five seasons included in our data (2014-2019), the median effective reproduction number was 1.11 (IQR: 0.84-1.41) for HCoV-HKU1 and 1.00 (IQR: 0.84-1.41) for HCoV-OC43. Results were similar using various choices of incidence proxy and serial interval distributions (Fig S1, Fig S2) .

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • annual peak and effective reproduction number: 1
    • annual peak and immunity cross: 1, 2
    • annual peak and immunity duration: 1, 2
    • annual peak and immunity duration seasonal variation: 1, 2
    • annual peak and incidence proxy: 1
    • average number and effective reproduction number: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • average number and immunity cross: 1, 2
    • average number and immunity duration: 1
    • average number and incidence curve: 1, 2
    • average number and infect individual: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • average number and interval distribution: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
    • betacoronavirus incidence and incidence proxy: 1
    • betacoronavirus transmission and immunity cross: 1, 2
    • betacoronavirus transmission and immunity duration: 1, 2
    • betacoronavirus transmission and immunity duration seasonal variation: 1
    • betacoronavirus transmission and incidence proxy: 1
    • effective reproduction number and immunity cross: 1, 2, 3
    • effective reproduction number and immunity duration: 1, 2, 3
    • effective reproduction number and incidence curve: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8