Selected article for: "high risk and predictive modelling"
Author: Chee, Marcel Lucas; Ong, Marcus Eng Hock; Siddiqui, Fahad Javaid; Zhang, Zhongheng; Lim, Shir Lynn; Ho, Andrew Fu Wah; Liu, Nan
Title: Artificial Intelligence Applications for COVID-19 in Intensive Care and Emergency Settings: A Systematic Review
  • Cord-id: q03ghi7p
  • Document date: 2021_4_29
    • ID: q03ghi7p
    Snippet: Background: Little is known about the role of artificial intelligence (AI) as a decisive technology in the clinical management of COVID-19 patients. We aimed to systematically review and critically appraise the current evidence on AI applications for COVID-19 in intensive care and emergency settings. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library databases from inception to 1 October 2020, without language restrictions. We included peer-r
    Document: Background: Little is known about the role of artificial intelligence (AI) as a decisive technology in the clinical management of COVID-19 patients. We aimed to systematically review and critically appraise the current evidence on AI applications for COVID-19 in intensive care and emergency settings. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library databases from inception to 1 October 2020, without language restrictions. We included peer-reviewed original studies that applied AI for COVID-19 patients, healthcare workers, or health systems in intensive care, emergency, or prehospital settings. We assessed predictive modelling studies and critically appraised the methodology and key findings of all other studies. Results: Of fourteen eligible studies, eleven developed prognostic or diagnostic AI predictive models, all of which were assessed to be at high risk of bias. Common pitfalls included inadequate sample sizes, poor handling of missing data, failure to account for censored participants, and weak validation of models. Conclusions: Current AI applications for COVID-19 are not ready for deployment in acute care settings, given their limited scope and poor quality. Our findings underscore the need for improvements to facilitate safe and effective clinical adoption of AI applications, for and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • absolute lasso regression selection shrinkage operator and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
    • absolute lasso regression selection shrinkage operator and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
    • absolute lasso regression selection shrinkage operator and machine learning model: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • acceptance applicability and location time: 1
    • accuracy feature selection and logistic regression: 1
    • accuracy feature selection and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
    • accuracy random forest model and logistic regression: 1, 2
    • accuracy random forest model and logistic regression model: 1
    • accuracy random forest model and machine deep learning: 1, 2
    • accuracy random forest model and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
    • accuracy random forest model and machine learning model: 1, 2, 3
    • acm digital library and additional relevant study: 1
    • acm digital library and logistic regression: 1